|
Approaches to Fighting the Formosan Subterranean
Termite
This multi-agency termite control project will be unlike any previously
attempted. A variety of control methods will be tried, many of them complementary
to one another. The project will involve a wide range of scientific disciplines,
from entomology to biochemistry--but everyone in the community also has
an important role to play.
Speaking in Termite Tongues: Chemical Communication
Many insects "say it with pheromones"--naturally produced chemicals
that serve as sexual signals--when it's time to mate. But others make
war, not love, with their body chemistry. Some termites' salivary glands
contain irritants or toxins that deliver a message of "Get lost!" rather
than "Come hither." Other chemicals signal when a group member has found
food. The chemical messages of bees and wasps are much better understood
than termite talk. Knowing more about termites' chemical lingo may help
us give them the word that they're not welcome in town. Or we may lead
them on--out of our communities and somewhere where they can't cause
trouble.
"Hi, Remember Me?": Natural Enemies from Back Home
The Formosan subterranean termites' natural foes from their native lands
didn't join them in the New World. But these enemies--possibly bacteria,
fungi, or insect predators--could prove invaluable in keeping termites
in check. Naturally, such organisms would have to be extensively evaluated
to ensure they pose no threat to people, pets, livestock and plants in
our community. But if a bacterium like Bacillus thuringiensis or
a fungi like Metarhizium anisopliae can make the grade, they could
be important allies in this termite battle. And there could be other
natural enemies--currently unknown--that will be safe for our area, but
bad news for the termites.
Steeling Ourselves Against Infestation: Physical Barriers
It's been demonstrated that stainless steel mesh provides an effective
barrier against termites. Australian researchers have suggested incorporating
these barriers into buildings at the design and construction stages.
Other reports show stainless steel is 100 percent effective at blocking
termites' advances over a three-year period.
It's also been recommended that every building have at least six inches
of clearance above the foundation where termite shields made of stainless
steel, plastic, metal or concrete can create a barrier. Builders also
could deter termites by keeping any wooden foundation structure from
extending through the concrete foundation and avoiding foundation cracks.
Scientists may also find new materials or new building strategies that
prove economical and effective.
Bait and Switch: Better Termite Control through Chemistry
Getting rid of termites with chemicals is nothing new. One promising
approach: A toxin is mixed with bait, combining something termites crave
with a little lethal lagniappe. Such systems are commercially
available today. These systems use wood blocks to monitor for the presence
of termites. When they are found, the wood is switched with a toxic bait
which the termites eat and take back to share with their nestmates, thus
killing many termites or even the entire colony. In the 1930s, Paris
Green, an emerald-colored toxin, was shown to be lethal to termites when
mixed with food.
Today we know more about the effects of chemicals on public health and
the environment. The chemicals used in the baiting systems are much safer
than most of the soil termite killers that have been used to protect
homes. The chemicals used today are more specific for termites. In some
systems, the chemicals are only applied when termites are present, making
them environmentally safe.
The products were developed in response to EPA's 1988 ban on the use
of powerful organochlorines, one of the top tools to fight termites in
years gone by.
One class of weapons will likely become even more important in the future:
insect growth regulators, the same chemicals that naturally launch insects
into adulthood. These chemicals can be manipulated to send their signals
at the wrong time and disrupt the termites' normal development, providing
a very effective and safe control.
Another alternative is slower-acting toxins that, unlike organochlorines,
break down quickly and pose little threat to humans. Commercial products
of this type are already on the market. What's lacking is a side-by-side
comparison of their effectiveness. There are also chemicals that seem
to make wood less appetizing to termites. New research could tell us
which product is most effective or help find new chemicals that might
be even safer or better for termite control.
Bugs' Lunch: How Nutrition Knowledge and Better Sanitation Help
Researchers will also conduct complex chemical analysis of the vitamins,
minerals, proteins, fatty acids and carbohydrates termites require. The
scientists aren't trying to bring the termites to optimal health; rather,
they're searching for the insects' nutritional "Achilles' heel."
We already know some of their dietary weaknesses. All termites avoid
a lack of moisture; that's why they thrive in coastal areas. Without
constant moisture, the termites can't thrive as a colony and many would
die.
Keeping leaky roofs fixed and gutters clean would help by keeping wood
building structures dry. Construction practices in the French Quarter
make moisture control very difficult, but it's important there, too.
Moreover, the insects need a specific balance of nutrients to maintain
optimal health. If scientists can pinpoint what attracts and stimulates
the termites to feed, we could develop even better baits causing the
colony to crash.
Keeping An Eye on Invaders: Geographic Information Technology
and Monitoring
With all of these approaches, the ultimate question is, "Does it work?".
That means researchers must be able to monitor the termites, both in
the laboratory and at infestation sites. If you're seeing swarms of termites,
odds are the structure has already suffered damage. Detection of termites
inside a wall or underground requires sophisticated technology and instruments.
One of these devices can detect termite activity by eavesdropping on
the sound of termites chewing. But acoustic detection is expensive and
labor-intensive, and can only detect the termites if placed very close
to them. Development of new technology with greater sensitivity would
allow us to "see" the termites inside a wall or find very small colonies
when they are easier to control. These instruments would allow us to
put toxins right where the termites are.
Researchers might install "mini-walls" with plexiglass peepholes to
monitor colony behavior inside an infested building. That also would
allow scientists to check the termites' response to new controls. These
transportable pseudo-structures could also be used to capture the insects
and take them back to the laboratory for more study.
Another possible research tool: a computerized mapping system that enables
researchers to follow the spread of colonies--and see for themselves
what factors are associated with most infestations. Being able to predict
where the termites might be would allow for more effective monitoring.
Another use of mapping technology is to determine which controls have
the greatest success.
For more information, contact the Southern Regional Research Center,
Agricultural Research Service, USDA, New Orleans, La. 70179. Telephone:
(504) 286-4444.
|