
New research by ARS scientists highlights how
ranchers can help preserve sage grouse habitat with careful grazing management.
Click the image for more information about it.
|

|
ARS Scientists Study Effects of Grazing on Grouse Habitat
By Ann Perry
April 30, 2010 Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
scientists at the Eastern Oregon
Agricultural Research Center in Burns, Ore., are taking a careful look at
how grazing cattle affect sage-grouse habitat on high desert rangelands.
Cattle share this habitat with sage-grouse, which are chicken-sized birds
that are notorious for the showy commotion they create during mating season.
But the sage-grouse numbers have declined throughout their range, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has
added the species as a candidate for Endangered Species Act protection. FWS
will review the status of the sage-grouse annually to determine whether it
warrants more immediate attention for being listed as an endangered species.
If the sage-grouse is listed, this would increase scrutiny of management
practices on rangelands that provide habitat for the species. The birds depend
on sagebrush and the grasses growing beneath these shrubs to provide food and a
safe place to nest and raise their young.
Ranchers worry that an increased emphasis on management for sage-grouse
habitat could limit their use of rangelands. Such a limitation could seriously
threaten the livelihood of ranchers who graze their animals on public lands.
ARS rangeland scientists David Ganskopp (now retired) and Chad Boyd studied
cattle grazing patterns on sagebrush communities. They found that cattle first
preferred to graze on perennial grass growing between sagebrush plants. These
grasses between sagebrush plants were called interspace tussocks,
which are the individual grass plants.
When cattle consumed around 40 percent of the interspace tussocks, they then
began to graze on the tussocks growing beneath sagebrush itself. The
researchers also noted that grass tussocks under spreading, umbrella-shaped
shrub canopies were less likely to be grazed than tussocks beneath erect,
narrow canopies.
Boyd and Ganskopp concluded that ranchers could preserve grouse habitat by
monitoring the rate at which cattle were consuming interspace tussocks and
moving them to new grazing lands when 40 percent of the interspace tussock had
been consumed. Their findings also suggest that cattle impacts on grouse
nesting habitats may be affected by site factors like sagebrush shape and
stature that are not readily controlled with grazing management.
Results from this study were published in Rangeland Ecology &
Management.
ARS is the principal intramural scientific research agency of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture.