Soil Drainage Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
 
Barry Allred
Kevin King
Publications
Research Projects
Drainage Filtration
Watershed Assessment of Conservation Practices
ARS News Articles
Watershed Characterization of Managed Turf
Watershed Response to Urbanization
Norman Fausey
Peter C. Smiley, Jr.
Tara Vantoai
 

Watershed Assessment of Conservation Practices
headline bar

Rationale:

  • Nutrients, pesticides, and emerging contaminants in drinking water supplies.
  • 11,000 community water systems serving 180 million US customers.
  • Emphasis on federal policy and dollars targeted for conservation programs.
  • Excessive agrichemical concentrations in Hoover Reservoir requiring high cost treatment prior to delivery.
  • Extensive subsurface tile drainage in watershed.
  • 800,000 City of Columbus residents receive drinking water from Hoover Reservoir.

Goal:

  • Identify, develop, and quantify watershed scale water quality impacts of conservation practices.
 

Objective:

  • Quantify the watershed scale water chemistry impacts of precision nutrient management and pesticide management

Approach:

  • Paired design using both channelized and unchannelized streams; each watershed has an approximate 2 square mile drainage area

Progress & Findings:

  • Paired design is valid and appropriate for these research sites.
  • Three years of baseline data on each of four targeted watersheds.
  • Field level management records collected for 70% of cropped area.
  • Development, release, and implementation of a special Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) targeting precision nutrient management and pesticide management.
  • Pesticide management practices significantly reduce stream level atrazine concentrations.
 

Objective:

  • Characterize the hydrology of channelized versus nonchannelized streams.

Approach:

  • Two years of hydrology measurements on two channelized and two nonchannelized streams within UBWC watershed.

Findings:

  • Hydrology of channelized and unchannelized streams is different.
  • Measured differences in hydrology primarily realized in summer and winter.
  • Headwater streams in UBWC watershed generally follow the accepted hydrology paradigm for headwater streams.
 

Objective:

  • Assess the benefits and costs of implementing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed.

Approach:

  • Conjoint analysis to determine value of improved drinking water.

Findings:

  • For every dollar spent on conservation practices the City of Columbus saved $2.58 on activated carbon.
  • Atrazine concentrations in Hoover Reservoir were reduced.
 

WATERSHED ASSESSMENT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES (PDF)


   
 
Last Modified: 06/09/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House