Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS FROM FORAGES AND BIOMASS ENERGY CROPS

Location: Cell Wall Biology and Utilization Research

Title: ECONOMICS AND ENERGY OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM ALFALFA, CORN, AND SWITCHGRASS IN THE UPPER MIDWEST

Authors
item Vadas, Peter
item Barnett, Kenneth - UNIV OF WISCONSIN
item Undersander, Daniel - UNIV OF WISCONSIN

Submitted to: Forage Focus
Publication Type: Popular Publication
Publication Acceptance Date: December 20, 2007
Publication Date: December 30, 2007
Citation: Vadas, P.A., Barnett, K.H., Undersander, D.J. 2007. Economics and energy of ethanol production from alfalfa, corn, and switchgrass in the Upper Midwest. Forage Focus. December 2007:p. 4-5.

Technical Abstract: In the U.S., biomass crop systems will be needed to meet future ethanol production goals. We estimated production costs, profits, and energy budgets for three potential crop systems for the Upper Midwest: continuous corn, an alfalfa-corn rotation, and switchgrass. Production costs, profits, and on-farm energy use were greatest for continuous corn, less for alfalfa-corn, and least for switchgrass. Energy to transport crops was similar for all crop systems. Both energy used to produce ethanol and energy output in ethanol was greatest for continuous corn, less for alfalfa-corn, and least for switchgrass. By-product energy outputs from distillers grains and alfalfa leaf meal was 30-40% greater for alfalfa-corn than continuous corn. Switchgrass had no by-products. Net energy produced (outputs - inputs) was greatest for continuous corn, followed by alfalfa-corn, and then switchgrass. Efficiency of energy production (outputs / inputs) was greatest for switchgrass, followed by alfalfa-corn, and then continuous corn. Our analysis emphasizes tradeoffs among crop systems. Corn may produce the most ethanol and net energy, but least efficiently and with the greatest erosion and N leaching. Corn may have the greatest production costs, but return the greatest profit. Comparatively, alfalfa-corn will produce less ethanol and net energy, but more efficiently and with less erosion and little N leaching. Production costs will be less for alfalfa-corn than continuous corn, but profits may also be less. Switchgrass will produce the least ethanol and net energy, but will do so most efficiently, and with little erosion. Nitrogen leaching will be less for switchgrass than corn, but greater than alfalfa-corn. Switchgrass may be the least expensive to produce, but may return a profit only if selling prices or yields are high.

   

 
Project Team
Weimer, Paul
Casler, Michael
Muck, Richard
Vadas, Peter
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Bioenergy & Energy Alternatives (307)
  Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (306)
 
Patents
 
 
 
Last Modified: 05/23/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House