Dairy Forage and Aquaculture Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: REDESIGNING FORAGE GERMPLASM AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENCY, PROFIT, AND SUSTAINABILITY OF DAIRY FARMS

Location: Dairy Forage and Aquaculture Research

Title: Grazing: From the farm to research and back to the farm

Author

Submitted to: Symposium Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: January 24, 2011
Publication Date: January 27, 2011
Citation: Brink, G.E. 2011. Grazing: From the farm to research, and back to the farm. In: Proceedings of the North Central Ohio Dairy Grazing Conference, 27-28 January 2011, Walton, Ohio. Ohio Small Farm Institute, Coshocton, Ohio. p. 11.

Technical Abstract: The goal of grazing-based dairy producers is to manage pastures to be a sustainable and economical feed source. Pasture management issues that are frequently raised include the effect of residue height of vegetative grass, mob-stocking of mature grass, and grazing stressed grass on yield distribution and annual productivity. Four erect-growing grasses were grazed by Holstein heifers from April to October of 2009 and 2010 in south central Wisconsin at a vegetative stage (12 in. tall) to a 6, 3, or 1.5 in. residue, at a mature stage (24 in. tall) to a 6 in. residue, and when less than 4 in. in the early spring when growth began, in the summer when drought-stressed, or in late fall before growth was stopped by cold temperatures. Reducing residue height of vegetative grass increased rotation time and yield at each grazing event. Annual yield increased when residue was reduced from 6 to 3 in, but declined if residue was reduced to 1.5 in. As residue height was reduced, the date at which pastures were ready to be grazed the following spring became later. The primary effect of grazing mature forage was to increase the rotation time, increase the yield at each grazing event, and reduce forage nutritive value. Grazing in the spring when grass is short had little effect on pasture productivity during the remainder of the growing season. Grazing drought-stressed grass during the summer had the most detrimental effect because productivity was reduced after growing conditions improved in late summer and fall. Grazing in the fall just before growth was halted by cold temperatures had no effect on pasture productivity the following year.

   

 
Project Team
Casler, Michael
Brink, Geoffrey
Grabber, John
Sullivan, Michael
Hatfield, Ronald
Riday, Heathcliffe
Muck, Richard
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Bioenergy (213)
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
Related Projects
   EVALUATING PERENNIAL GRASS CULTIVARS FOR THEIR USE AS BIOMASS ENERGY CROPS IN UPPER MICHIGAN
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House