Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Posters
 

Research Project: BREEDING, GENETICS, STOCK IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RUSSIAN HONEY BEES FOR MITE AND SMALL HIVE BEETLE CONTROL AND POLLINATION

Location: Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research

Title: Does the removal of mite-infested brood facilitate grooming?

Authors

Submitted to: American Bee Research Conference Proceedings
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: January 11, 2013
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: The relationship between the removal of mite-infested brood and mite drop was compared using Russian (RHB, n = 9) and Italian (IHB, n = 9) honey bee colonies. A cloake board was used to isolate test brood frame on the top hive body and the metal sheet served as a varroa trap. Inoculum mites were collected from newly sealed larvae and each was marked using correction fluid (Kirrane et al., 2012 J. Apic. Res. 51: 212-213). Brood cells randomly received one of the following groups: 1) brood inoculated with one female varroa, 2) brood with capping opened and closed without mite inoculation (o/c), and 3) undisturbed brood cells as control. Brood removal and mite drop were determined every day for eight days. Both stocks removed more mite-inoculated brood than o/c or control groups (P <0.0001). RHB (87.9 ± 2.0%) significantly removed more inoculated brood than IHB (61.9 ± 7.3%) (P = 0.0001). Increased removal of frozen brood by RHB has also been demonstrated (de Guzman et al., 2002 Am. Bee J. 141: 58-60). Although both stocks removed brood every day, brood removal peaked during the first four days for IHB and during the first two days for RHB colonies. Overall, the RHB (2.5 ± 0.1 days) removed brood faster than the IHB (3.0 ± 0.1 days) colonies (P = 0.014). Fallen marked mites were collected from traps every day with peaks observed during the first three days coinciding with the peak of brood removal. Overall, about 35% of the introduced mites dropped from the RHB compared to 24% for IHB. A similar observation was reported by Rinderer et al. (2001 Apidologie 32: 381-394). Regardless of stock, the number of dropped mites increased with an increase in brood removal (r = 0.089, P = 0.0001) (see figure). Brood removal may be one of the major causes of high mite drop in honey bee colonies.

   

 
Project Team
Rinderer, Thomas - Tom
Bourgeois, Lanie
Villa, Joseph - Jose
Holloway, Beth
Tarver, Matthew
De Guzman, Lilia
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Crop Production (305)
 
Related Projects
   Genome Characterization of the Mite Varroa Destructor, the Primary Pest of Honey Bees
   DEVELOPMENT OF APIS MELLIFERA SYRIACA GENETIC STOCK WITH INCREASED RESISTANCE TO PARASITIC BEE MITES
   PREPARING FOR VARROA: HOW SUSCEPTIBLE ARE AUSTRALIAN HONEY BEE STOCKS?
 
 
Last Modified: 05/21/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House