Skip to main content
ARS Home » Pacific West Area » Albany, California » Western Regional Research Center » Invasive Species and Pollinator Health » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #153930

Title: INTEGRATED CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT OF KNAPWEED AND ANNUAL BROME ON DOD INSTALLATIONS (CS 1145)

Author
item PASCHKE, MARK - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item REDENTE, EDWARD - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item WARREN, STEVEN - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item KLEIN, DONALD - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Smith, Lincoln
item HOWARD, MICHAEL - US DEPT. OF ENERGY
item KLAWITTER, ALAN - US DEPT. OF ENERGY

Submitted to: Partners in Environmental Technology Technical Symposium and Workshop
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 12/31/2002
Publication Date: 12/5/2002
Citation: PASCHKE, M.W., REDENTE, E.F., WARREN, S.D., KLEIN, D.A., SMITH, L., HOWARD, M.E., KLAWITTER, A.L. Integrated Control and Assessment of Knapweed and Annual Brome on DOD Installations (CS 1145). PARTNERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM AND WORKSHOP. 2002.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: We are investigating alternative control and assessment strategies for spotted and diffuse knapweeds and cheatgrass on two U.S. military installations: Fort Carson, Colorado and Yakima Training Center, Washington. We are attempting to control alien invasive weeds by using a combination of four manipulations that accelerate natural secondary succession. These are: 1) reduction of the weed population using biological control (for knapweeds) or burning (for cheatgrass), 2) reducing soil nitrogen availability, 3) reseeding with desirable mid- and late-seral plant species, and 4) reintroduction of a native late-seral soil microbial community. Our research plots are being monitored using remote sensing techniques in order to develop methods for assessing the status of weed populations and monitoring large-scale effectiveness of control methods. Results will be extrapolated to larger spatial and temporal scales using an ecosystem dynamics model in order to gain insight into ecological mechanisms of control methods so that we can project the likely effectiveness of single and combined control methodologies. Results from the 2001 sampling (year two) indicate that significant desirable treatment effects have already occurred in many of the test plots, including reduced weed densities.