Forage and Range Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Working Groups
Plants For The West Flash Presentation
Mojave Project
Utah Shrubland Management Project
 

Title: EFFECTS OF TANK TRACKING ON RANGE GRASSES

Authors
item Palazzo, Antonio - US ARMY CORPS OF ENG
item Jensen, Kevin
item Waldron, Blair
item Cary, Timothy - US ARMY CORPS OF ENG

Submitted to: Terramechanics Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: October 4, 2004
Publication Date: March 4, 2005
Citation: Palazzo, A.J., Jensen, K.B., Waldron, B.L., Cary, T.J. 2005. Effects of tank tracking on range grasses. Terramechanics Journal.

Interpretive Summary: As the intensity of military training increased, there was a decrease in the desired plant materials on the site and an increase in the amount of bare ground. Introduced grass species established better at the Yakima Training Center, Yakima, WA, than did the native grasses. Mean establishment and persistent rankings after five years at Site A were Siberian wheatgrass>intermediate wheatgrass>crested wheatgrass>bluegrasses>Russian wildrye>western wheatgrass>basin wildrye>Indian ricegrass>bottlebrush. Mean establishment and persistent rankings at Site B were Snake River wheatgrass>bluebunch wheatgrass>thickspike wheatgrass. There was a strong correlation between plant establishment and persistence (stand) and the plants ability to recover after training. Among the natives, Snake River wheatgrass and western wheatgrass were the most resilient across the different tracking intensities. The presence of rhizomes in western wheatgrass appeared to increase its ability to recover after tracking. Sandberg bluegrass successfully invaded both the native and introduced sites after tracking.

Technical Abstract: The Department of Defense (DoD) must constantly balance its military mission and its commitment to stewartship on large tracks of federal land. These military training lands are some of the most intensely used land in the United States and training requires that vegetation, primarily grasses, be as resilient as possible. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (i) plant establishment and (ii) the effect of light to heavy training activity that ranged from zero to four passes on range grasses at the Yakima Training Center, Yakima, WA. Characters measured include percent ground cover and forage yield of the target species, percent bluegrass, bare ground, and cheatgrass encroachment. Mean establishment and persistent rankings after five years at Site A were Siberian wheatgrass>intermediate wheatgrass>crested wheatgrass> bluegrasses>Russian wildrye>western wheatgrass>basin wildrye>Indian ricegrass>bottlebrush. Mean establishment and persistent rankings at Site B were Snake River wheatgrass>bluebunch wheatgrass> thickspike wheatgrass. There was a strong correlation between plant persistence (stand) and ability to recover after training. The largest decline in percent target species was observed between the two and four-pass treatments. After five years, cheatgrass was not able to encroach Snake River wheatgrass, Siberian wheatgrass, and bluebunch wheatgrass plots. Tracking generally reduced the stand of the target species, increased the amount of bare ground, and enhanced the ability of cheatgrass to invade.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 06/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House