Livestock Behavior Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: SAFEGUARDING WELL-BEING OF FOOD PRODUCING ANIMALS

Location: Livestock Behavior Research

Title: Gas alternatives to carbon dioxide for euthanasia: A piglet perspective

Authors

Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: May 1, 2012
Publication Date: March 1, 2013
Citation: Lay Jr, D.C., Rault, J., Mcmunn, K.A., Marchant Forde, J.N. 2013. Gas alternatives to carbon dioxide for euthanasia: A piglet perspective. Journal of Animal Science. 91:1-10.

Technical Abstract: The identification and validation of a humane method to euthanize piglets is critical to address concern that current methods are not acceptable. This research sought to: 1) identify a method of scientifically determining if pigs find a specific euthanasia method aversive, and 2) develop an innovative method of gas euthanasia. Experiment 1 tested four gas combinations in an approach avoidance test. Pigs were allowed to enter a chamber in which the gases were gradually displacing the air: CO2, (100%); N2O/CO2 (70 %/30%); Ar/CO2 (70%/30%); and N2/CO2(70%/30%). The duration of testing was shortest for the pigs in the CO2 treatment when compared to pigs in Ar/CO2 (P < 0.001), N2O/CO2 (P < 0.01) and the N2 (P < 0.001) treatments, 3.1 ± 0.2; 9.60 ± 0.4; 8.5 ± 0.6; 9.9 ± .1 minutes, respectively. In Experiment, 2 pigs were euthanized using a 2-step procedure using a gradual fill of 1 of 4 gas mixtures (90% CO2, 70% N2/30% CO2, 70% N2O/30% CO2 or 70% N2O/30% O2. When the pig became panicked or anesthetized it was placed into 90% CO2. The CO2 pigs had to be moved into the chamber pre-charged with CO2 sooner (P < 0.001) at 2.9 ± 0.3 minutes, than for the N2/CO2 (6.4 ± 0.6 minutes) N2O/CO2 (6.7 ± 1.0 minutes), and N2O/O2 (14.7 ± 2.1 minutes). All pigs in the N2O/O2 treatment were moved into the CO2 chamber because they became anesthetized. In contrast, none of the pigs in the other treatments became anesthetized and were moved into the CO2 chamber because they either started to squeal or panic. Although death using nitrous oxide took the longest, pigs did not enter a state of panic, thus this treatment was the most humane.

   

 
Project Team
Lay, Jr, Donald - Don
Cheng, Heng Wei
Eicher, Susan
Marchant-Forde, Jeremy
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
 
Related Projects
   A MODEL FOR PAIN IN FARM ANIMALS: INFRARED VS. HOT BLADE BEAK TRIMMING AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS IN LAYING HENS
   Dietary Modification to Eliminate Ulcers in Sows
   OSTEOPOROSIS IN WHITE LEGHORNS: THE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL LOADING DURING THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE LAYING HENS
   Effects of Heat Stress on Farm Animal Well-Being
   Designer Diets Decrease Aggression and Increase Welfare
 
 
Last Modified: 06/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House