Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Docs » 1999 ARS Annual Performance Report » Page 7

Page 7
headline bar
1 - 1999 ARS Annual Performance Report
2 - Page 2
3 - Page 3
4 - Page 4
5 - Page 5
6 - Page 6
7 - Page 7

ADMINISTRATIVE, PROGRAMMATIC, AND MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES

Initiative 1:Support Education: 'Support Higher Education in Agriculture to Give the Next Generation of Americans the Knowledge, Technology, and Applications Necessary to Enhance the Competitiveness of United States Agriculture.'

All of the activities relating to this initiative are cross-cutting in nature and are reflected in the strategies and performance measures under the five ARS Goals and Initiatives 2 and 3.

Initiative 2:National Agricultural Library: 'Ensure and Enhance Worldwide Access to Agricultural Information through the Programs of the National Agricultural Library (NAL).'

Analysis of Results:This Initiative focuses on the work of the National Agricultural Library. Under this Initiative, 13 Indicators are aligned under 9 Performance Goals. The progress projected in all 13 Indicators was completed or substantially completed during FY 1999.

STRATEGY 2.1:Access to information: Collect, organize, and provide access to information that supports agricultural programs and responds to information needs.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.1.1:Implemented selection guidelines for the electronic resources to be acquired and used by NAL.

Task completed in FY 1997.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.1.2:Expanded representation of electronic formats such as Internet resources, online databases, and digital documents in AGRICOLA and NAL's online catalog.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will

continue the transition from print to electronic collections.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:To prepare for the move of Reference to its temporary location during renovation, NAL cancelled subscriptions to the paper copies of several expensive reference tools and abstracting and indexing services that are duplicated by electronic subscriptions, most notably, Chemical Abstracts.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Users have quick and convenient access to key references. These tools can now be accessed by multiple simultaneous users from multiple locations. NAL saved several thousands of dollars in materials expenditures by cancelling these paper copies.

implement active links between the AGRICOLA citations to USDA electronic resources and full text documents. NAL will acquire and index additional electronic journals.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL added to the AGRICOLA database, references and Internet addresses for over 1,100 electronic documents, reports and serial titles which were predominantly USDA publications. A mechanism was developed to identify invalid links to the Internet resources and begin maintaining these to ensure ongoing access.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Users of NAL’s Internet AGRICOLA database can access immediately the full text of relevant resources retrieved in searches. Access to currently maintained electronic resources is timely and convenient.

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.1.3:A gateway is provided to a large body of electronic information on agriculture over a network such as the Internet.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will

in collaboration with its land grant university partners, evaluate alternatives provided by new technology that will enhance the content, features, services, and use of the system.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL and its land grant partners initiated a pilot project which seeks to demonstrate that use of standard metadata and classification structure will improve access.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The pilot project is underway but will not conclude until FY 2000.

develop a classification structure for organizing AgNIC resources by subject. NAL will implement a standard metadata record for description of and access to AgNIC information resources.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL developed a subject classification structure for organizing AgNIC resources, and a standard metadata record for the description and access to AgNIC information resources. The metadata record maps to several international standards for description, including Dublin Core, GILS (Government Information Locator Service), and MARC (Machine Readable Cataloging).

IMPACT/OUTCOME:If, at the conclusion of the pilot project, these two NAL-developed tools for organizing AgNIC are adopted for widespread use, they have the potential for dramatically improving access to agricultural information.

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.1.4:Demonstrate increased use of agricultural information by institutions of higher education.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will collect and analyze tracking information to determine customer needs. This information will be valuable in restructuring and enhancing the information and services offered to institutions of higher education.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL has collected and is entering into a database, customer requests for FY 1997 and FY 1998. The results of this study will be reported in the second quarter of FY 2000.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The resulting usage data will help in planning future products and services.

STRATEGY 2.2:Meet customer needs for information: Anticipate and provide information products and services, including educational programs, that enable NAL's diverse customers to identify, locate, and obtain desired information on agricultural topics.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.2.1:The time for processing requests for services and delivering the information requested is further reduced.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will expand electronic methods of document delivery to reduce time to requesters. New software delivery packages and enhancements to current software will continue to be reviewed and implemented.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL expanded electronic methods of document delivery to reduce time to requesters. New software delivery packages and enhancements to current software were reviewed and implemented. Electronic requests continued to be the primary method of transmission. NAL upgraded all four Ariel TM workstations and added a fifth Ariel TM workstation in FY 1999. All Ariel TM workstations received upgraded software packages. Additional memory was added to two fax/scanners for greater efficiency in sending and receiving files. An additional high volume printer was also added. The Pineville Arkansas Forest Service Station, the Arboretum library, the ARS Plum Island Animal Disease Center library, and the J. D. Boyd Library of Alcorn State University were provided copies of Ariel TM software for their use.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:As a result of these activities, efficiency and accuracy in receipt and delivery of requested materials continues to improve.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.2.2:The gap between the time that information is published and made available in NAL produced databases is further reduced.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will

complete the conversion of bibliographic records to electronic form for all monographs in its collection and release them in AGRICOLA.NAL will also develop plans for adding records of older USDA serials to AGRICOLA.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL completed the conversion of bibliographic records for monographs. The addition of the records to AGRICOLA has begun and is scheduled to be completed by December 31, 1999.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:More printed resources in agriculture and related topics were made available to users through NAL’s online catalog and distributed to AGRICOLA users.

increase the use of shelf-ready processing for additional categories of collection materials.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Workflow changes were implemented to add records to the catalog for books at the time of order receipt.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Books received from the Library’s principal vendor are accompanied by cataloging records, expediting the addition of these books to the collection with a minimum of additional processing. Bibliographic records and materials are available to on-site and interlibrary loan users in a shorter time.

revise technical processing priorities and establish goals for receipt processing, indexing, and cataloging.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:This activity was begun in FY 1999 but not yet completed. Processing priorities for receiving and cataloging have been revised and implemented. Throughput goals for indexing are in development.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:This activity will be completed in FY 2000.

implement procedures to add in-process serials to the collection immediately upon receipt.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:A multi-year contract to convert the manual serial records file to machine readable form was issued in September 1999. The inventory of in-process serials were all cataloged or prepared for shelving in the collection. Current serial receipts are now being cataloged and released to the collection within 30 days.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:NAL has decreased the time needed to complete the processing of new serial titles and provided catalog entries with collection locations for over 400 in-process titles. FY 1999 serials cataloging output increased by 100 percent over the previous fiscal year. Timely document delivery and fulfillment of onsite requests are improved by the rapid delivery of books and serials to the collection.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.2.3:Expanded provision of Internet and other technology-related training programs for NAL customers.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will make training materials available electronically to all of USDA, and implement plans for pilot testing of satellite-based training with some NAL customers. These actions will enable more NAL customers to have access to training.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL tested the technical feasibility and identified the issues involved with negotiating agencywide access to electronic resources. In addition, web-based access to licensed resources for the ARS staff were evaluated.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS users will have available from the desktop PC, a selection of relevant agricultural information resources. This will ensure timely on demand access to needed information to support ongoing research.

STRATEGY 2.3:Preservation of significant materials: Preserve significant and important works in agriculture and the fields related to agriculture to ensure availability of NAL's collections to current and future generations.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.3.1:Establishment of a national archive for agricultural literature that serves as a centralized storage facility for archival copies prepared by cooperators in the program.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will continue to build the national archive for agricultural literature and acquire additional offsite storage space for archival copies prepared by program cooperators.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL obtained the master microfilm negatives of the original state and local agriculture projects from the 1980s, for transfer to National Underground Storage (NUS), in Boyers, Pennsylvania, a secure facility with preservation environmental controls. In addition, NAL has obtained the master negatives from phase one of the U.S. Agricultural Information Network (USAIN) preservation microfilming project for transfer to NUS.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The establishment of this national archive for agricultural information will ensure that significant research information on agriculture is preserved and available for current and future generations of scientists, educators, and producers.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 2.3.2:Development of a program for monitoring quality of electronically archived materials to ensure that the data remain accessible.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, NAL will begin to implement the action plan for preserving digital USDA publications (pending funding allocation) in collaboration with a steering committee representing mission areas of USDA.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:NAL convened a national steering committee representing mission areas of the USDA to begin implementation of the Framework for Preservation of and Permanent Public Access to USDA Digital Publications . The committee is overseeing a small scale pilot project to inventory digital publications produced by one USDA agency.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The implementation of the recommendations in the Framework for Preservation of and Permanent Public Access to USDA Digital Publications will have a long-term impact on the availability and distribution of agricultural information to the USDA and the United States citizens. Development of a program for monitoring the quality of electronically archived publications will ensure both preservation and access to important digital USDA publications.

Initiative 3:Creative Leadership: Promote Excellence, Relevance, and Recognition of Agricultural Research through Creative Leadership in Management and Development of Resources, Communications Systems, and Partnerships with Our Customers and Stakeholders.

Analysis of Results:This Initiative focuses on a number of leadership activities/areas that are essential for ARS to maintain the core scientific capability needed to fulfill its mission. Under this Initiative, 17 Indicators are aligned under 24 Performance Goals. Because of the unique and dynamic nature of measuring activities under this Initiative, the Agency was not able to identify specific Indicators for several Performance Goals in FY 1999 and several other Indicators were not successfully completed. In some of these areas, the Agency is rethinking its approach to planning and reporting under certain Performance Goals and Indicators. When this review is completed, its’ conclusions will be reflected in the next Annual Performance Plan and Report.

The Report indicates which Performance Goals and Indicators were not accomplished. The progress projected in the remaining Indicators was completed or substantially completed during FY 1999.

STRATEGY 3.1:Develop research agenda: Identify ARS program priorities and core research capabilities and use them to provide leadership in development of the coordinated REE and national research agendas.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.1.1:The annual performance plan is delivered on time.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will meet all REE and Departmental deadlines for submissions required by the strategic plan.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS’ Annual Performance Plan was submitted within the time frames established by USDA and REE.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS’ Annual Performance Plan was submitted to Congress as part of the total Departmental performance plan. REE did not develop a coordinated research agenda in FY 1999.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.1.2:Meet REE deadlines for submission of material for inclusion in the Coordinated Research Agenda.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will meet REE deadlines for submission of materials related to the Coordinated Research Agenda.

REE did not develop a coordinated research agenda in FY 1999.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.1.3:Annual conferences of public and private individuals are convened to discuss major researchable issues in agriculture and to articulate approaches to addressing these problems.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will select the researchable aspects of a high priority national issue that will benefit from a broad public/private, Federal/State/local dialogue and convene an appropriate conference.

ARS has recently aggregated its 1,100+ research projects into 23 National Programs. The full implementation of these programs will take several years. Instead of a single national conference, ARS decided to concentrate its efforts in FY 1999 on a series of National Program Workshops (some cover an entire National Program and others address program components). Approximately 25 National Program Workshops were held during FY 1999. The workshops generated synergistic interactions between customers, stakeholders, and ARS scientists that will help to determine the research agenda and ensure the relevancy of the Agency’s research program.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.1.4:Rapid responses to crises.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will respond to threats to the security of American agriculture and to the safety of the Nation’s food supply.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) (scab) of wheat and barley has caused devastating yield losses (more than $3 billion since 1993) and resulted in lower quality grain because of the presence of a fungus-produced mycotoxin. In the last three years ARS funding for research on FHB has increased dramatically from $200,000 to $5,800,000 annually. A large research program involving ARS and university scientists has been established to deal with the FHB problem. Goals are the generation of FHB-resistant varieties and the development of integrated disease control strategies.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Through a comprehensive, coordinated research program solutions to the scab problem are expected within a few years. Without this program, solving the scab problem would have been substantially delayed.

STRATEGY 3.2:Civil Rights: ARS is committed to the principal of Civil Rights and the implementation of the Civil Rights Action Team Report. The ARS Civil Rights Staff (CRS) recognizes that systematic communication is important as a means of ensuring that its services meet the expectations and needs of its customers/stakeholders, including managers, supervisors, and employees.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.2.1:Written policies and guidance to facilitate implementation of the Civil Rights program.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will develop a series of topical brochures and fact sheets to provide specific EEO/Civil Rights program information to ARS managers, supervisors, employees, EEO Advisory Committees, students, universities, and others. Topics will include student programs, special emphasis programs, and the role of EEO Advisory Committees. These are needed so that managers and employees are better informed and students and universities will have increased awareness of opportunities.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Two topical brochures have been developed on the informal and formal EEO Complaints Program. The brochures are currently being reviewed by the ARS Information Staff. The Counseling Fact Sheet was distributed to management and is available to all employees via the ARS EEO/CR Website.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS managers, supervisors, and employees will be better informed.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.2.2:Improve all aspects of the Title VII program which includes EEO training, data collection, and monitoring and evaluation.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will

develop and implement a system to monitor and evaluate the EEO program by conducting onsite EEO program evaluations. The system is needed to determine the extent to which ARS is complying with equal employment opportunity requirements.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:The indicator has not been completed but it will be completed in FY 2000. ARS has contracted with an 8(a) firm to conduct an Agencywide on-site EEO compliance review during FY 2000.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The compliance review will provide a systematic method for obtaining information and feedback from and to ARS managers, supervisors, and staff. If appropriate, ARS will take corrective action.

develop and implement a system to routinely collect data of all employment related activities. The system is needed to analyze and monitor data; develop reports showing trends, patterns, accomplishments, and needs; and develop recommendations for improvement.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS has contracted with a firm to develop the database which will provide all information regarding employment-related activities and it will provide a mechanism for analysis.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS will effectively utilize agency resources and will provide accurate reports to management on an as-needed basis.

STRATEGY 3.3:Additional funding: Encourage acquisition of additional funding to improve ARS programs and priorities.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.3.1:Partnerships are established.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.3.2:Procedures are implemented.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.3.3:Outside support increases.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will meet or exceed the targets set for securing additional funding.

ARS is rethinking this Performance Goal and Indicator. As presently configured the approach is not meeting the Agency’s needs. If a more useful approach can be determined, reporting will begin in FY 2001.

STRATEGY 3.4:Customer service: Improve customer service.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.4.1:Improved customer satisfaction.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will establish targets for expanding customer input and improving customer satisfaction.

ACCOMPLISHMENT:As part of the process of implementing the new National Programs, ARS held approximately 25 National Program Workshops during FY 1999. These sessions brought together a wide range of customers, stakeholders, partners and ARS scientists and managers to discuss the future directions of research in each programmatic area. Evaluation forms were used at each workshop which reflected a high level of customer/stakeholder satisfaction.

IMPACT:The National Program Workshops have expanded and formalized the interaction between ARS and its customers and stakeholders. This interaction increases mutual understanding and helps ensure that the scientific work of the Agency is relevant to the needs of American agriculture and related industries.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.4.2:Customer needs are identified.

Reporting will begin in FY 1999.

STRATEGY 3.5:Management of facilities: Provide appropriately equipped Federal facilities required to support the research and information activities of ARS into the next century.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.5.1:Criteria and priorities identified.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will update annually the ARS facilities modernization plan which identifies ongoing repair and maintenance needs of existing Agency laboratory and support facilities.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS implemented Congressionally directed new construction and facilities modernization and repair and maintenance programs.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The Agency implemented priority construction, modernization, and repair and maintenance needs.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Updated the 10 Year Facilities Plan which identified future projects or needs in terms of repair and maintenance/modernization, new construction, energy retrofit, accessibility, hazardous waste clean up, and building disposal/demolition needs from FY 2000 to FY 2009.

Implemented Congressionally directed new construction and facilities modernization at priority locations.

Implemented repair and maintenance programs at 38 locations. Some of the types of projects include repairs or upgrades to roofs, building systems, sewage systems, roads, greenhouses, fencing, accessibility projects, Y2K upgrades, and fire alarm systems.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS scientists have available state of the art facilities to conduct research. In addition, the employee work environment meets safety and health requirements, as well as the President’s energy conservation goals.

STRATEGY 3.6:Maintenance of core research capabilities: Develop and implement comprehensive human resource systems and policies to support and enhance ARS' core research capabilities while maintaining the flexibility to shift research and form interdisciplinary teams to address emerging problems.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.6.1:Identify core capability requirements and develop a scientific staff to meet long-term research needs.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will increase its core capability by significantly increasing the number of research scientist positions (SYs).

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Continued the Consolidated SY Recruitment strategy which included:

Establishing a three cycle annual schedule for the simultaneous announcement of all vacant SY positions.

Continued placement of paid ads in Science and other appropriate professional journals.

Posting all vacancy announcements on ARS’ home page, the Office of Personnel Management’s electronic bulletin board, and other bulletin boards as appropriate.

Hiring 127 scientists in FY 1999. The core SY workforce showed a net increase of 51; another 50 SYs have been selected, with entry on duty dates set for FY 2000.

Publishing seven new human resource management policy and procedural issuances including one on the Research Position Evaluation System (RPES).

Publishing seven additional Policies and Procedures issuances as part of the ARS human resources management program in support of REE’s research mission, including one governing receipt of Foreign Gifts and Decorations (P&P 468.4), which particularly affects senior research scientists who have achieved international stature and recognition. The Research Position Evaluation System (RPES) P&P and Manual were also revised and published.

Conducting four ARS Area Office orientation sessions for new research scientists.

Conducting six new scientist orientation sessions for newly hired research scientists. They were introduced to ARS and Area management philosophy and expectations, including the administrative requirements and procedures needed to be successful.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS has implemented an aggressive strategy to ensure the quality of its scientific workforce and has reestablished the Agency’s competitive recruitment position in the scientific community. ARS has increased its core research capability by a net of 51 scientific research positions.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.6.2:Establish a database of ARS experts by discipline and research areas of expertise.

ARS reevaluated this approach and decided not to develop this database at this time.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.6.3:Train 1,300 postdoctoral students, and competitively select 10 percent of them to fill full time positions.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will

continue to train Research Associates and at least 260 postdocs each year, and competitively select 10 percent of them as full time Agency employees. As the number of full time scientists increases, the number of postdocs hired can be expected to decrease each year.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS had 261 postdocs on the rolls; 37 have been placed into permanent research scientist positions.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:These accomplishments exceed the goals of 260 postdocs on board and conversion of 10 percent of them into full time SYs.

STRATEGY 3.7:Provide administrative support to REE: Serve as the lead agency in providing administrative and financial management services for Research, Education, and Economics.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.7.1:Customer participation in planning processes.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will review customer needs concerning the AFM Strategic Plan.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Contacted customers, employees and stakeholders for input on emerging issues, changes needed in AFM program emphasis, and recommendations for improving AFM processes and service delivery. Nearly 200responses were received.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Customer participation in the AFM strategic planning process resulted in customer core service needs being identified, prioritized, and addressed in the goals and objectives of the revised AFM Strategic Plan dated March 1999.

ARS reviewed customer needs regarding the ARS Strategic Plan. Customer input served as the basis for refinement of the AFM Strategic Plan.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:AFM published detailed information on plans to carry out strategic objectives on its website. AFM routinely collected feedback on customer needs and priorities and used this information to make minor adjustments in the plan. AFM also began designing more formal mechanisms to collect and analyze information from customers on the adequacy, timeliness, and quality of services.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:Customer needs were identified and included in the AFM Strategic Plan.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.7.2:Strategic Plan is developed and communicated to REE customers.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will revise the AFM Strategic Plan and make it available to customers, employees, and stakeholders.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:A revised Strategic Plan was developed and placed on the AFM home page for review and reference by customers, employees, and stakeholders.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:The AFM Strategic Plan addressing customer service requirements was issued in April.

During FY 1999, AFM will circulate the revised Strategic Plan to its REE customers.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:The Strategic Plan was revised and circulated.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:AFM services continue to be provided consistent with customer need as identified in the Strategic Plan.

STRATEGY 3.8:Program excellence and relevance: Ensure excellence and relevance of ARS programs through a variety of comprehensive reviews.

 

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.8.1:Internal and external peer reviews are conducted on all research projects before implementation.

Reporting will begin in FY 2000.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.8.2:Review of the productivity, quality, and impact of individual scientists as scheduled in the Research Position Evaluation System (RPES).

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will conduct approximately 350 RPES reviews of research scientists each year.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS staff conducted 412 RPES reviews with the following results:

180 Promotions

224 Remains-in-Grade

1 Insufficient Factual Basis

7 Grade/Category Problems

Based on USDA/OPM instructions, demotions as an RPES panel option were discontinued several years ago. If a case is scored below grade, management has the responsibility to work with the scientist to improve performance in the position over a specified period of time. If improvement does not occur so that the position can be properly classified at least at the current grade level, then the scientist is either reassigned to a vacant non-SY position or is removed from the Federal service.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS maintains a high quality scientific research workforce that is able to respond to the critical needs of American agriculture, as shown by the productivity, quality, and impact of the scientists’ accomplishments.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.8.3:Program reviews are conducted periodically, and programs are sustained or redirected as appropriate.

Reporting will begin in FY 2000.

STRATEGY 3.9:Improve financial management: ARS/Administrative and Financial Management will support Departmental efforts to improve financial management.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.9.1:Implement integrated management systems in USDA.

Reporting will begin upon issuance of Departmental evidence on the Foundation for Financial Information System (FFIS) for mandatory use by USDA Agencies.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS convened a REE Foundation Financial Information System (FFIS) preimplementation team. The USDA Risk Management Agency in Kansas City, Missouri, was visited to learn about its strategy, experiences, and 'pros and cons' with the implementation of FFIS. Several preplanning sessions with the Office of Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) Project Office Staff were conducted to become better acquainted with the FFIS product. A planning package was developed with recommended corporate strategy, issues, actions and options for REE senior management decisions to begin implementing the FFIS system and associated applications.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS, on behalf of REE, will use a conservative implementation approach that permits the fund holders to maintain stewardship and reporting control over the status of funding sources, assets, obligations, and expenditures. This approach will afford REE agencies sufficient budgetary and proprietary accounting controls, and time to test the new FFIS accounting system to contain and fix any problems that may occur early on.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.9.2:Correct in a timely manner internal control deficiencies.

Reporting will begin upon issuance of Departmental evidence on the FFIS for mandatory use by USDA agencies.

During FY 1999, ARS will continue compliance with the Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA), including timely completion of audit report recommendations and the timely correction of any FMFIA weaknesses that are identified.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:No material weaknesses were identified in program reviews and/or evaluations conducted by staffs. Neither the GAO, the OIG, nor other external audit organizations disclosed any findings of material weaknesses during FY 1999.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS’ 1999 evaluations indicated that the systems for internal accounting and administrative control provided reasonable assurance that control objectives were achieved.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.9.3:Make available reliable cost accounting information.

Indicators:

During FY 1999, ARS will continue to work with the OCFO and the National Finance Center (NFC) to implement USDA cost accounting standards on behalf of all REE agencies, and perform biennial reviews of user charges as required by OMB Circular A-25. ARS will also continue to review Agency operations to identify new potential user fee situations.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:Complete cost accounting applications and reporting will not be accomplished until the implementation of FFIS. The design of FFIS will allow REE to capture cost accounting information for its programs according to Federal accounting standards.

REE has conducted a biennial review of fees and other charges and reported the information in a OCFO data call. In addition, an evaluation was made of potential user fee (things of value) situations that should be reported, but none were found.

Published Bulletin 99-250, 'Collection and Use of Fees for Revocable Permits and Easements,' that provides guidance and instructions for the collections and use of fees for revocable permits, easements, or other special use authorizations for the occupancy or use of land and facilities under agency custody and control.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:No potential new activities or situations were identified relating to user fee requirements other than the information reported in the biennial review. Collections of fees for revocable permits and easements were returned to agency programs.

PERFORMANCE GOAL 3.9.4:Clean and timely audit opinions are provided on audited financial statements.

Indicators:

Reporting will begin upon issuance of Departmental evidence on the FFIS for mandatory use by USDA agencies.

During FY 1999, ARS will prepare, review, and certify the yearly consolidated financial statements of the REE agencies as required under the Chief Financial Officer’s Act.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:ARS responded to all requests from OIG for financial information, and arranged for site visits by auditors to gather information in order to render opinions on audited financial statements.

IMPACT/OUTCOME:ARS is awaiting response from OIG on FY 1999 audited financial statements.

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]