Author
![]() |
Fain, Glenn |
![]() |
GILLIAM, CHARLES - AUBURN UNIV |
![]() |
SIBLEY, JEFF - AUBURN UNIV |
![]() |
BOYER, CHERYL - AUBURN UNIV |
Submitted to: Acta Horticulturae
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 6/1/2007 Publication Date: 2/29/2008 Citation: Fain, G.B., Gilliam, C.H., Sibley, J.L., Boyer, C.R. 2008. Establishment of Greenhouse-Grown Tagetes patula and Petunia xhybrida in 'Whole Tree' Substrates. Acta Horticulturae 782:387-393. Interpretive Summary: The objective of the research presented here was to evaluate processed whole pine trees as alternative growth substrates for greenhouse-grown marigold and petunia when compared to standard peatmoss based substrate. All marigold plants were considered marketable at 34 DAP regardless of substrate used. At 28 DAP, petunias grown in any 100% whole tree or 4:1 whole tree:peat substrate were significantly smaller than plants in any 1:1 WT:peat or the peat-lite substrate. The results of this experiment indicate that whole tree substrates, especially when combined with peatmoss are a potential alternative to conventional greenhouse substrates. Technical Abstract: Rising transportation cost of peat moss from Canada or Europe is negatively affecting the profitability of many greenhouse operators. The industry has recognized a need to explore alternatives to peat for greenhouse substrates. The objective of this research was to evaluate processed whole pine (Pinus taeda) trees (WT) as an alternative growth substrate for greenhouse crops. Studies were conducted at the Southern Horticultural Laboratory (SHL) in Poplarville, MS, USA and Young’s Plant Farm (YPF) in Auburn, AL, USA. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were harvested from a 10 year old pine plantation in south Mississippi. The entire tree including needles was processed in several stages to pass a 0.48, 0.64, or 0.95 cm screen. The resulting three WT substrates were used alone or mixed with 20 % or 50 % (by volume) Canadian sphagnum peatmoss (peat) and compared to an industry standard mix of 8:1:1 (by volume) peat:vermiculite:perlite (peat-lite). On 14 April 2006 (20 April 2006 for YPF) 15.2 cm containers (AZF 0600, ITML Horticultural Products Inc.) were filled and four plugs (288 cell) of either marigold (Tagetes patula ‘Little Hero Yellow’) or petunia (Petunia xhybrida ‘Dreams Pink’) were planted into each container. At 34 days after potting (DAP) there were no differences in flower number for marigold. Petunias grown in peat-lite substrate had over twice the number of flowers than observed on plants grown in other substrates. Leaf chlorophyll content was similar for petunia, and marigold among all substrates. At 34 DAP regardless of substrate treatment all marigolds were considered marketable. At 28 DAP, petunias grown in any 100% WT or 4:1 WT:peat substrate were smaller than plants in any 4:1 WT:peat or the peat-lite substrate. At 28 DAP petunia grown in peat-lite substrate were also larger than those grown in any 4:1 WT:peat substrate however all plants were considered marketable. The results of this experiment indicate that whole tree substrates, especially when combined with peatmoss are a potential alternative to conventional greenhouse substrates. |