Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #230892
Title: Intercomparison of a 'Bottom-up' and 'Top-down' Modeling Paradigm for estimating carbon and latent heat fluxes over a variety of vegetative regimes across the U.S., Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Author
item Houborg, Rasmus
item Anderson, Martha
item NORMAN, JOHN - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
item WILSON, TIM - NOAA
item MEYERS, TILDEN - NOAA

Submitted to: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 6/22/2008
Publication Date: 11/3/2009
Citation: Houborg, R.M., Anderson, M.C., Norman, J.M., Wilson, T., Meyers, T. 2009. Intercomparison of a 'Bottom-up' and 'Top-down' modeling paradigm for estimating carbon and latent heat fluxes over a variety of vegetative regimes across the U.S. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 149:1875-1895.

Interpretive Summary: An accurate quantification of energy and carbon fluxes is of paramount importance for a wide range of ecological, agricultural, and meteorological applications. This paper demonstrates the utility of two modeling strategies for quantifying coupled land surface fluxes of CO2 and water, which differ distinctly in their description of CO2 assimilation processes. The ‘bottom-up’ model of land-atmosphere carbon exchange is based on detailed mechanistic descriptions of leaf-level photosynthetic processes scaled to the canopy whereas the ‘top-down’ scaling approach neglects the behavior of individual leaves and consider the canopy response to its environment in bulk. Water and carbon flux simulations were evaluated across time scales of hours, days, seasons and years for a variety of natural and agricultural ecosystems, using micrometeorological data from several AmeriFlux sites across the U.S. The comparison showed that the simpler ‘top-down’ model often performed better than the more detailed scaled-leaf model that has many species-specific tunable model parameters that are a considerable challenge to specify with acceptable accuracy for applications over a variety of vegetative regimes. The study provides insight into the challenges of model parameterization and may act as a guideline for the degree of model simplicity required for useful flux predictions at larger scales on a routine basis.

Technical Abstract: Biophysical models intended for routine applications at a range of scales should attempt to balance the competing demands of generality and simplicity and be capable of realistically simulating the response of CO2 and energy fluxes to environmental and physiological forcings. At the same time they must remain computationally inexpensive and sufficiently simple to be effectively parameterized at the scale of application. This study investigates the utility of two modeling strategies for quantifying coupled land surface fluxes of carbon and water, which differ distinctly in their description of CO2 assimilation processes. ‘Bottom-up’ models of land-atmosphere carbon exchange are based on detailed mechanistic descriptions of leaf-level photosynthetic processes scaled to the canopy whereas ‘top-down’ scaling approaches neglect the behavior of individual leaves and consider the canopy response to its environment in bulk. Effective intercomparisons of a light-use-efficiency (LUE)-based model of canopy conductance and a mechanistic model of leaf photosynthesis-stomatal response that employs a ‘two-leaf’ scaling strategy are facilitated by embedding both canopy sub-models in the Atmosphere-Land Exchange (ALEX) surface energy balance model. Water and carbon flux simulations are evaluated across time scales of hours, days, seasons and years for a variety of natural and agricultural ecosystems, using micrometeorological data from several AmeriFlux sites across the U.S. While both modeling paradigms reproduced observed magnitudes and variances of carbon and water vapor exchange on hourly and daily timescales with acceptable accuracy, the simpler LUE-based model often performed better than the more detailed scaled-leaf model that has many species-specific tunable model parameters that are a considerable challenge to specify with acceptable accuracy for applications over a variety of vegetative regimes. Actual light-use efficiencies vary significantly in response to changing environmental conditions and the success of LUE-based modeling frameworks rely on their ability to realistically respond to changes in light environment, atmospheric humidity, CO2 concentration and a desiccating environment.