Skip to main content
ARS Home » Northeast Area » Leetown, West Virginia » Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #235285
Title: Membrane biological reactor treatment of a saline backwash flow from a recirculating aquaculture system

Author
item SHARRER, MARK - FRESHWATER INSTITURE
item YOSSI, TAL - UNIV MD BIOTECH INSTITUTE
item FERRIER, DREW - HOOD COLLEGE
item HANKINS, JOSEPH - FRESHWATER INSTITUTE
item SUMMERFELT, STEVEN - FRESHWATER INSTITUTE

Submitted to: Aquacultural Engineering
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 10/16/2006
Publication Date: 3/1/2007
Citation: Sharrer, M.J., Yossi, T., Ferrier, D., Hankins, J.A., Summerfelt, S.T. 2007. Membrane biological reactor treatment of a saline backwash flow from a recirculating aquaculture system. Aquacultural Engineering. 36:159-176.

Interpretive Summary: Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) reduce water use and place waterborne wastes into concentrated and relatively small discharges. When a RAS is operated at high salinities for culture of marine species, recovering the saltwater contained in the backwash effluent would allow for reuse within the RAS and reduce salt discharge to the environment. Scientists at the Conservation Fund's Freshwater Institute (Shepherdstown,WV) evaluated a pilot-plant membrane biological reactor (MBR) to determine ease of operation and effectiveness at removing bacteria, turbidity, suspended solids, and nutrients from the biosolids backwash flow discharged from RAS. Results indicate that the pilot-scale MBR system removed in excess of 99% of the suspended solids, carbonaceous BOD, and bacteria, as well as more than 93% of the total nitrogen contained within the backwash flow when operated at salinity levels of 0 ppt, 8 ppt, 16 ppt, and 32 ppt. The high degree of treatment provided by the MBR system would protect the environment and provide the opportunity to reclaim saline discharge flow.

Technical Abstract: A recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) can minimize water use, allowing fish production in regions where water is scarce and also placing the waterborne wastes into a concentrated and relatively small volume of effluent. The RAS effluent generated during clarifier backwash is usually small in volume (possibly 0.2-0.5% of the total recirculating flow when microscreen filters are used) but contains high levels of concentrated organic solids and nutrients. When a RAS is operated at high salinities for culture of marine species, recovering the saltwater contained in the backwash effluent could allow for its reuse within the RAS and also reduce salt discharge to the environment. Membrane biological reactors (MBRs) combine activated sludge type treatment with membrane filtration. Therefore, in addition to removing biodegradable organics, suspended solids, and nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, MBRs retain high concentrations of microorganisms and, when operated with membrane pore sizes < 1 micron, exclude microorganisms from their discharge. In this research, an Enviroquip (Austin, Texas) MBR pilot-plant was installed and evaluated over a range of salinities to determine its effectiveness at removing bacteria, turbidity, suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus and cBOD5 content from the approximately 22 m3/day concentrated biosolids backwash flow discharged from the RASs at The Conservation Fund Freshwater Institute. The MBR system was managed at a hydraulic retention time of 40.8 hours, a solids retention time of 64 +/- 8 days, resulting in a Food: Microorganism ratio of 0.029 d-1. Results indicated excellent removal efficiency (%) of TSS (99.65 +/- 0.1 to 99.98 +/- 0.01) and TVS (99.96 +/- 0.01 to 99.99 +/- 0.0) at all salinity levels. Similarly, a 3-4 Log10 removal of total heterotrophic microbes and total coliform was seen at all treatment conditions. Total nitrogen removal efficiency (%) ranged from 91.8 +/- 2.9 to 95.5 +/- 0.6 at the treatment levels and was consistent, provided a sufficient acclimation period to each new condition was given. Conversely, total phosphorus removal efficiencies (%) at 0ppt, 8ppt, 16ppt and 32ppt salinity were 96.1 +/- 1.0, 72.7 +/- 3.5, 70.4 +/- 2.3, and 65.2 +/- 5.4, respectively, indicating reduced phosphorus removal at higher salinities.