Author
Charlet, Laurence | |
AIKEN, ROBERT - Kansas State University Extension Center | |
Seiler, Gerald | |
CHIRUMAMILLA, ANITHA - North Dakota State University | |
Hulke, Brent | |
KNODEL, JANET - North Dakota State University |
Submitted to: Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 12/3/2009 Publication Date: 3/12/2010 Citation: Charlet, L.D., Aiken, R.M., Seiler, G.J., Chirumamilla, A., Hulke, B.S., Knodel, J.J. 2008. Resistance in Cultivated Sunflower to the Sunflower Moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology. 25(4):245-257. Interpretive Summary: The sunflower moth has been the most widespread and damaging sunflower insect pest in North America. Larval feeding destroys disk flowers preventing seed formation and also damages mature seeds. Larval feeding in the head also may provide a site for entrance of the fungal pathogen of Rhizopus head rot, which can further reduce yield and affect the oil quality. A 5-year field study initiated in 2002, evaluated 42 sunflower accessions, 25 breeding lines, and 40 interspecific crosses for resistance to infestation by naturally occurring populations of the sunflower moth. Germplasm with resistance to infestation and damage from larval feeding by the sunflower moth was determined from this research. Accessions PI 175728 and PI 307946 had less than 3% feeding damage per head in all three years of testing. Some interspecific crosses showed evidence of resistance. PAR 1673-1 had less than 2% seed damage in 2002 and 2003 and less than 3% in 2005. PRA PRA 1142 sustained less than 3% seed damage and STR 1622-1 had less than 2% seed damage in three years of trials. Breeding lines with potential resistance included 01-4068-2, which had the least amount of seed damage per head in 2002 (less than 1%) and in 2003 averaged only 2% damage. Line 01-4080-1, with less than 1% damage in 2002 and in 2003, was the lowest in the trial. Hybrid 894 was included as a standard check; however, it consistently had among the lowest average seed damage from sunflower moth feeding among the germplasm evaluated. Our investigation showed potential in developing resistant genotypes for the sunflower moth to reduce seed feeding injury and to prevent yield loss for the sunflower producer. The development of germplasm with host plant resistance would provide another tool in an integrated pest management approach for the sunflower moth. Technical Abstract: A 5-year field study evaluated 42 sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) accessions, 25 breeding lines, and 40 interspecific crosses for resistance to infestation by naturally occurring populations of the sunflower moth, Homeosoma electellum (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Germplasm with resistance to infestation and damage from larval feeding by the sunflower moth was determined from this research. Accessions PI 175728 and PI 307946 had < 3% feeding damage per head in all three years of testing. Some interspecific crosses showed evidence of resistance; PAR 1673-1 had < 2% seed damage in 2002 and 2003 and < 3% in 2005. PRA PRA 1142 sustained less than 3% seed damage and STR 1622-1 had < 2% seed damage in three years of trials. Breeding lines with potential resistance included 01-4068-2, which had the least amount of seed damage per head in 2002 (< 1%) and in 2003 averaged only 2% damage. Line 01-4080-1, with < 1% damage in 2002 and in 2003, was the lowest in the trial. Hybrid ‘894’ was included as a standard check; however, it consistently had among the lowest average seed damage from H. electellum feeding among the germplasm evaluated. Our investigation showed potential in developing resistant genotypes for the sunflower moth to reduce seed feeding injury and to prevent yield loss for the sunflower producer. The development of germplasm with host plant resistance would provide another tool in an integrated pest management approach for H. electellum. Additional effort is in progress to use the identified lines to introgress resistance genes into cultivated sunflower through conventional breeding facilitated by the use of marker-assisted selection. |