Author
Submitted to: Natural Resources Research Update (NRRU)
Publication Type: Research Technical Update Publication Acceptance Date: 2/16/2010 Publication Date: 2/16/2010 Citation: Sainju, U.M. 2010. Carbon and nitrogen pools in soil aggregates separated by dry and wet sieving methods. Natural Resources Research Update (NRRU). Update #252267. Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Soil aggregation influences conservation and mineralization of C and N but aggregate separation method may influence levels of aggregate size distribution and quantification of C and N pools. Aggregate size distribution and soil organic C (SOC), soil total N (STN), particulate organic C and N (POC and PON), microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN), potential C and N mineralization (PCM and PNM), NH4-N, and NO3-N concentrations in aggregates separated by dry and wet sieving methods were compared. The PCM, PNM, MBC, and MBN are considered as active pools, SOC and STN as slow pools, POC and PON as intermediate pools, and NH4-N and NO3-N as available pools. Aggregate separation was made in soil samples from 0 to 5 and 5 to 20 cm depths with various properties and cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Aggregate amount was higher in dry than in wet sieving in the 4.75-2.00 mm size class but the amount was higher in wet than in dry sieving in the 2.00-0.25 mm class in all sites, except Sidney. In cultivated soil, no definite trends in C pools in aggregates were observed between sieving methods. In no-till grassland soil, C pools were higher in dry than in wet sieving in the <0.25 mm but the trend reversed in the >2.00 mm fractions. In all fractions, active and available N pools were 2- to 30-fold higher in dry than in wet sieving, probably due to loss of water soluble N during wet sieving. Both C and N pools, except active C pools, in aggregates were usually higher in the <0.25 mm than in the other fractions, regardless of sieving methods. Aggregate size distribution and C and N pools determined by dry and wet sieving were well correlated, except for active N pools. Dry sieving of moist soil (water content around 25% field capacity) can be used as a rapid and reliable method of separating soil aggregates for determining C and N pools compared with wet sieving which reduces microbial activities and N mineralization due to the destruction of physical habitat of microbial communities in aggregates and excludes water soluble C and N pools (Sainju, 2006). Publications contributing to the NRRU Release as shown above: Sainju, U.M. 2006. Carbon and nitrogen pools in soil aggregates separated by dry and wet sieving methods. Soil Science 172:937-949. For more information contact Dr. Upendra Sainju (upendra.sainju@ars.usda.gov) |