Author
ROBBINS, ROBERT - University Of California | |
AMARAL-ZETTLER, LINDA - Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory | |
BIK, HOLLY - University Of New Hampshire | |
BLUM, STAN - California Academy Of Sciences | |
EDWARDS, JAMES - Smithsonian Institute | |
FIELD, DAWN - Centre For Ecology And Hydrology | |
GARRITY, GEORGE - Michigan State University | |
GILBERT, JACK - Argonne National Laboratory | |
KOTTMANN, RENZO - Max Planck Society | |
KRISHTALKA, LEONARD - Kansas State University | |
Lawrence, Carolyn |
Submitted to: Standards in Genomic Sciences
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 7/16/2012 Publication Date: 10/11/2012 Citation: Robbins, R.J., Amaral-Zettler, L., Bik, H., Blum, S., Edwards, J., Field, D., Garrity, G., Gilbert, J.A., Kottmann, R., Krishtalka, L., Lawrence, C.J. 2012. RCN4GSC workshop report: managing data at the interface of biodiversity and (meta)genomics, March 2011. Standards in Genomic Sciences. 7(1):159-165. Interpretive Summary: In order for the outcomes of research to be useful, outcomes must be documented and made accessible. Data must be integrated and catalogued in a way that could be made accessible for automated data mining, and standards must be developed and pervasively adopted. Once in place, the use of such standards will enable researchers to access more data automatically using online databases that store the information that enables the development of applied solutions to real-world problems based upon stored biological data. Technical Abstract: The Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) is an international working body with the mission of working towards richer descriptions of genomic and metagenomic data through the development of standards and tools for supporting the consistent documentation of contextual information about sequences. Because work at this interface is expanding rapidly, efforts to facilitate appropriate data management must also occur rapidly. Therefore, this meeting was convened as a planning session, aimed at getting as much information "on the table" as possible. Specifically, the goal was to identify potential for positive interactions and progress, especially building on extant successes at establishing data standards by the GSC and by the biodiversity and ecological communities. |