Author
Funk, Paul | |
Hardin Iv, Robert |
Submitted to: ASABE Annual International Meeting
Publication Type: Proceedings Publication Acceptance Date: 7/31/2012 Publication Date: 7/31/2012 Citation: Funk, P.A., Hardin Iv, R.G. 2012. Monitoring agricultural processing electrical energy use and efficiency. ASABE Annual International Meeting. PRESENTATION - Paper No. 121338018. Interpretive Summary: Energy costs have become proportionately larger as cotton post-harvest processing facilities have utilized other inputs more efficiently. A discrepancy in energy consumption per unit processed between facilities suggests that energy could be utilized more efficiently. Cotton gin facilities were instrumented to monitor electricity use throughout the post-harvest season. Cleaning, ginning and packaging energy consumptions were comparable; large differences were observed in materials handling. In some cases motors were oversized. Energy consumption per unit processed was decreased with increasing processing rate. Energy savings can be realized by: 1) designing gins to minimize materials-handling; 2) selecting efficient motors that are closely matched to their loads; 3) maintaining equipment to minimize down-time; and 4) operating at the maximum processing rate. Technical Abstract: Energy costs have become proportionately larger as cotton post-harvest processing facilities have utilized other inputs more efficiently. A discrepancy in energy consumption per unit processed between facilities suggests that energy could be utilized more efficiently. Cotton gin facilities were instrumented to monitor electricity use throughout the post-harvest season. Cleaning, ginning and packaging energy consumptions were comparable; large differences were observed in materials handling. In some cases motors were oversized. Energy consumption per unit processed was inversely proportional to processing rate. Energy savings can be realized by: 1) designing gins to minimize materials-handling; 2) selecting efficient motors that are closely matched to their loads; 3) maintaining equipment to minimize down-time; and 4) operating at the maximum processing rate. |