Author
GRACE, JAMES - Us Geological Survey (USGS) | |
ANDERSON, T - Wake Forest University | |
SEABLOOM, ERIC - University Of Minnesota | |
BORER, ELIZABETH - University Of Minnesota | |
ADLER, PETER - Utah State University | |
HARPOLE, W. - Iowa State University | |
HAUTIER, YANN - University Of Zurich | |
HILLEBRAND, HELMUT - Carl von Ossietzky University Of Oldenburg | |
LIND, ERIC - University Of Minnesota | |
PARTEL, MEELIS - University Of Tartu | |
BAKKER, JONATHAN - University Of Washington | |
BUCKLEY, YVONNE - Trinity College | |
CRAWLEY, MICHAEL - Imperial College | |
DAMSCHEN, ELLEN - University Of Wisconsin | |
DAVIES, KENDI - University Of Colorado | |
Fay, Philip | |
FIRN, JENNIFER - Queensland University Of Technology | |
GRUNER, DANIEL - University Of Maryland | |
HECTOR, ANDY - University Of Oxford | |
KNOPS, JOHANNES - University Of Nebraska | |
MELBOURNE, BRETT - University Of Colorado | |
MORGAN, JOHN - La Trobe University | |
ORROCK, JOHN - University Of Wisconsin | |
PROBER, SUZANNE - Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | |
SMITH, MELINDA - Colorado State University |
Submitted to: Nature
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 11/18/2015 Publication Date: 1/21/2016 Publication URL: http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/62419 Citation: Grace, J.B., Anderson, T.M., Seabloom, E.W., Borer, E.T., Adler, P.B., Harpole, W.S., Hautier, Y., Hillebrand, H., Lind, E.M., Partel, M., Bakker, J.D., Buckley, Y.M., Crawley, M.J., Damschen, E.I., Davies, K.F., Fay, P.A., Firn, J., Gruner, D.S., Hector, A., Knops, J.M., Melbourne, B.A., Morgan, J.W., Orrock, J.L., Prober, S.M., Smith, M.D. 2016. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature16524. Interpretive Summary: This manuscript develops a multivariate model of plant species richness and productivity of 39 herbaceous dominated plant communities from across five continents. The data were used to address an intensely debated topic in ecology, whether there is a generalizable quantitative relationship between species richness and productivity. Theory has held that productivity should be maximum at intermediate species richness, but despite many empirical studies, no consistent support has emerged, in part because of variation in methods. Analysis of this large richness/productivity dataset, collected with identical methods at all 39 sites, reveal the simultaneous operation of numerous mechanisms at various sites, most consistent with previous theoretical predictions. This result contributes to the resolution of the long-standing and contentious debate in ecology about the relationship between plant species richness and ecosystem productivity, by showing that there is no one overarching theoretical construct that can account of productivity/diversity relationships. Instead, the shape of the productivity diversity relationship is both context and scale specific. This will help focus future research on understanding the critical questions of when and where various mechanisms are operating. This fact will be important in designing more sustainable grazing and bioenergy systems. Technical Abstract: For 40 years ecologists have sought a canonical productivity-species richness relationship 48 (PRR) for ecosystems, despite continuing disagreements about expected form and 49 interpretation. Using a large global dataset of terrestrial grasslands, we consider how 50 productivity and richness relate to a suite of ecosystem drivers and responses. When only 51 the bivariate PRR relationship is examined, the result is an amorphous cloud with vague 52 features. However, when predictions from competing theories are integrated into a multi-53 process hypothesis, we detect numerous processes operating simultaneously: biomass 54 suppressing richness, richness promoting productivity, and resource supply gradients 55 promoting richness. Our multi-process approach provides a more complete understanding 56 of the controls and consequences of biological diversity and provides analytical support for 57 the integration of competing theories within a general framework. |