Author
HOBAN, SEAN - University Of Tennessee | |
STRAND, ALLEN - College Of Charleston | |
FRAGA, NAOMI - Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden | |
Richards, Christopher | |
SCHLARBAUM, SCOTT - University Of Tennessee |
Submitted to: Biological Conservation
Publication Type: Other Publication Acceptance Date: 3/18/2015 Publication Date: 4/1/2015 Citation: Hoban, S., Strand, A., Fraga, N., Richards, C.M., Schlarbaum, S. 2015. Developing quantitative seed sampling protocols using simulations: A reply to comments from Guja et al. and Guerrant et al.. Biological Conservation. 184 469-470. Interpretive Summary: The letter is a reply to comments made on a previous publication: Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure (Hoban and Schlarbaum, 2014). The intent of the reply is to acknowledge some of the practical limitations of this paper but to emphasize the benefit of quantitative evaluations of sampling success in a field largely devoid of quantitative metrics. In particular, the careful use of spatial simulation can be effective in evaluating alternative sampling approaches, developing testable hypotheses and potentially saving considerable resources in planning sampling missions. Technical Abstract: The letter is a reply to comments made on a previous publication: Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure (Hoban and Schlarbaum, 2014). The intent of the reply is to acknowledge some of the practical limitations of this paper but to emphasize the benefit of quantitative evaluations of sampling success in a field largely devoid of quantitative metrics. In particular, the careful use of spatial simulation can be effective in evaluating alternative sampling approaches, developing testable hypotheses and potentially saving considerable resources in planning sampling missions. |