Author
Sindelar, Aaron | |
Jin, Virginia | |
Schmer, Marty | |
Wienhold, Brian | |
FERGUSON, RICHARD - University Of Nebraska |
Submitted to: Proceedings Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference
Publication Type: Proceedings Publication Acceptance Date: 1/6/2016 Publication Date: N/A Citation: N/A Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Corn residue is a suitable feedstock for livestock forage and cellulosic ethanol. However, information about the response of the subsequent corn crop to residue removal in irrigated no-till continuous corn rotations is lacking. Subsequently, little is known regarding its response under limited irrigated conditions or how a carbon amendment (manure addition or cereal rye cover crop inclusion) affects the response. A study was established under limited and full irrigation to evaluate the effects of residue removal, carbon amendment, and N fertilization. Irrigation level played a critical role in the response of grain yield to residue removal. In 2011 and 2014, residue removal increased grain yield under both irrigation treatments. However, in 2012, when evapotranspiration (ET) was greater compared to the other years, residue removal decreased grain yield by 12% under limited irrigation, yet had no effect under full irrigation. The response of grain yield to N fertilization was dependent upon residue removal, and differed among years, with no clear response present. Carbon amendments only affected grain yield in 2014, with manure addition improving grain yield by 4 and 11% over the cover crop and control treatments, respectively. These initial results indicate that seasonal weather conditions can affect the response of grain yield to irrigation, residue removal, carbon amendment, and N fertilization. |