Author
CONFALONIERI, ROBERTO - University Of Milan | |
BREGAGLIO, SIMONE - University Of Milan | |
MYRIAM, ADAM - Cirad, France | |
RUGET, FRANCOISE - Inland Northwest Research Alliance, Inra | |
LI, TAO - International Rice Research Institute | |
HASEGAWA, TOSHIHIRO - National Institute For Agro-Environmental Sciences | |
YIN, XINYOU - Wageningen University | |
ZHU, YAN - Nanjing Agricultural University | |
BOOTE, KENNETH - University Of Florida | |
BUIS, SAMUEL - Inland Northwest Research Alliance, Inra | |
FUMOTO, TAMON - National Institute For Agro-Environmental Sciences | |
GAYDON, DONALD - Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | |
LAFARGE, TANGUY - Cirad, France | |
MARCAIDA, MANUEL - International Rice Research Institute | |
NAKAGAWA, HIROSHI - National Agriculture And Food Research Organization (NARO), Agricultrual Research Center | |
RUANE, ALEX - Nasa Goddard Institute For Space Studies | |
SINGH, BALWINDER - Indian Agricultural Research Institute | |
SINGH, UPENDRA - International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) | |
TANG, LIANG - Nanjing Agricultural University | |
TAO, FULU - Chinese Academy Of Sciences | |
FUGICE, JOB - International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) | |
HIROE, YOSHIDA - National Agricultural Research Organization - Japan (NARO) | |
ZHANG, ZHAO - Beijing Normal University | |
WILSON, LLOYD - Texas A&M Agrilife | |
Baker, Jeffrey | |
YANG, YUBIN - Texas A&M Agrilife | |
MASUTOMI, YUJI - Ibaraki University | |
WALLACH, DANIEL - Inland Northwest Research Alliance, Inra | |
ACUTIS, MARCO - University Of Milan | |
BOUMAN, BAS - International Rice Research Institute |
Submitted to: Environmental Modelling & Software
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 9/8/2016 Publication Date: 9/16/2016 Citation: Confalonieri, R., Bregaglio, S., Myriam, A., Ruget, F., Li, T., Hasegawa, T., Yin, X., Zhu, Y., Boote, K., Buis, S., Fumoto, T., Gaydon, D., Lafarge, T., Marcaida, M., Nakagawa, H., Ruane, A.C., Singh, B., Singh, U., Tang, L., Tao, F., Fugice, J., Hiroe, Y., Zhang, Z., Wilson, L.T., Baker, J.T., Yang, Y., Masutomi, Y., Wallach, D., Acutis, M., Bouman, B. 2016. A taxonomy-based approach to shed light on the babel of mathematical analogies for rice simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software. 85: 332-341. Interpretive Summary: Carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere is increasing mainly because humans burn fossil fuels for energy. Along with this rise in CO2 are projections on rising air temperatures. Globally, rice accounts for the majority of human food consumption. Rice is also known to be highly sensitive to both atmospheric CO2 and air temperature although different rice varieties can show wide differences in their response to CO2 and temperature. Because the types of precise environmental control in experimental system required to fully elucidate Rice’s potential response to these climate changes are often prohibitive due to cost constraints, some scientists resort to computer simulation models to arrive at answers concerning the World’s Food Security. This paper utilizes advanced statistical techniques to classify 13 different rice crop simulation models from around the world into 5 general clusters. They hypothesize that user subjectivity during model calibration often distorts simulations when attempting to fairly compare model performance. Technical Abstract: For most biophysical domains, different models are available and the extent to which their structures differ with respect to differences in outputs was never quantified. We use a taxonomy-based approach to address the question with thirteen rice models. Classification keys and binary attributes for each key were identified,and models were classified into five clusters using a binary similarity measure and the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean. PCA was performed on model output at four sites. Results indicate that (i)differences in structure often resulted in similar predictions and (ii)similar structures can lead to large differences in model outputs. A key hypothesis is that user subjectivity during calibration may hide expected relationships between model structure and behaviour. This explanation, if confirmed, highlights the need for shared protocols to reduce the degrees of freedom during calibrations, and to limit, in turn, the risk that user subjectivity influences model performance. |