Author
WEBER, JACKLYN - Washington University School Of Medicine | |
RYAN, KELSEY - Washington University School Of Medicine | |
TANDON, RAJIV - Action Contre La Faim | |
MATHUR, MEETA - Action Contre La Faim | |
GIRMA, TSINUEL - Jimma University | |
STEINER-ASIEDU, MATILDA - University Of Ghana | |
SAALIA, FIRIBU - University Of Ghana | |
ZAIDI, SHUJAAT - Aga Khan University | |
SOOFI, SAJID - Aga Khan University | |
OKOS, MARTIN - Purdue University | |
VOSTI, STEPHEN - University Of California | |
MANARY, MARK - Children'S Nutrition Research Center (CNRC) |
Submitted to: Maternal and Child Nutrition
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 10/24/2015 Publication Date: 4/1/2017 Citation: Weber, J.M., Ryan, K.N., Tandon, R., Mathur, M., Girma, T., Steiner-Asiedu, M., Saalia, F., Zaidi, S., Soofi, S., Okos, M., Vosti, S.A., Manary, M.J. 2017. Acceptability of locally produced ready-to-use therapeutic foods in Ethiopia, Ghana, Pakistan and India. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 13(2). doi:10.1111/mcn.12250. Interpretive Summary: Worldwide, only about 85% of children with severe acute malnutrition have access to a, ready-to-use-therapeutic food (RUTF) a consequence of importation costs and/cultural unacceptance of imported products. This research showed that with the use of an excel-based linear programming tool, as well as lab and production feasibility assessments, lower cost, cultural acceptable alternative country-specific RUTF formulations can be developed. The results of this study show that further investigation is need to prove that the products are equivalent in effectiveness to standard RUTF, but could be one promising solution the increase coverage of malnutrition treatment. Technical Abstract: Successful treatment of severe acute malnutrition has been achieved with ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), but only 15% of children with severe acute malnutrition receive RUTF. The objective of this study was to determine whether new formulations of RUTF produced using locally available ingredients were acceptable to young children in Ethiopia, Ghana, Pakistan and India. The local RUTFs were formulated using a linear programming tool that allows for inclusion of only local ingredients and minimizes cost. The study consisted of 4 two-arm, crossover, site-randomized food acceptability trials to test the acceptability of an alternative RUTF formula compared with the standard peanut-based RUTF containing powdered milk. Fifty children with moderate wasting in each country were enrolled in the 2-week study. Acceptability was measured by overall consumption, likeability and adverse effects reported by caregivers. Two of the four RUTFs did not include peanut, and all four used alternative dairy proteins rather than milk. The ingredient cost of all of the RUTFs was about 60% of standard RUTF. In Ethiopia, Ghana and India, the local RUTF was tolerated well without increased reports of rash, diarrhoea or vomiting. Children consumed similar amounts of local RUTF and standard RUTF and preferred them similarly as well. In Pakistan, local RUTF was consumed in similar quantities, but mothers perceived that children did not enjoy it as much as standard RUTF. Our results support the further investigation of these local RUTFs in Ethiopia, Ghana and India in equivalency trials and suggest that local RUTFs may be of lower cost. |