Skip to main content
ARS Home » Northeast Area » University Park, Pennsylvania » Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #347281

Title: Animal performance and environmental efficiency of cool-and warm-season annual grazing systems

Author
item DILLARD, LEANNE - University Of Auburn
item HANCOCK, DENNIS - University Of Georgia
item HARMON, DEIDRE - North Carolina State University
item MULLINEX, KIMBERLY - University Of Auburn
item BECK, PAUL - University Of Arkansas
item Soder, Kathy

Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 1/22/2018
Publication Date: 7/1/2018
Citation: Dillard, L., Hancock, D.W., Harmon, D.N., Mullinex, K.M., Beck, P.A., Soder, K.J. 2018. Animal performance and environmental efficiency of cool-and warm-season annual grazing systems. Journal of Animal Science.96:3491-3502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky025

Interpretive Summary: Annual forages can be used to ‘fill gaps’ when other perennial pasture forages are not as productive, such as mid-summer and late fall. Advances in plant breeding over the last 2 decades have increased forage yield and quality of annual forages, making them a viable option for grazing-based livestock systems. Strategic use of annual forages in livestock production has the opportunity to increase body weight gain of grazing ruminants compared to traditional perennial forage systems. Moreover, combining annual grazing systems with row cropping systems decreases both economic and environmental risk associated with the intensification and specialization of modern agriculture. However, more research is needed not only in individual seasonal systems, but also in year-round, integrated-crop livestock systems in order to determine possible economic and environmental benefits of such systems.

Technical Abstract: Annual forage crops can provide short-term grazing between crop rotations or can be interseeded into perennial pastures to increase forage quality and productivity. They also provide an opportunity to increase the economic and environmental sustainability of traditional grazing systems. Cool-season annual forage crops provide high quality, abundant forage biomass when forage availability from perennial forage species is lacking, reducing the need for stored feeds during the winter months. For example, ADG of 1.5 kg/d have been reported using small grains alone and in mixtures with annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) while maintaining an average stocking rate of 3.5 animals/ha. No-till (NT) establishment has been shown to be as effective as conventional tillage for establishing small grain pastures. Furthermore, stocker performance during the fall was not affected by tillage treatment, but during the spring grazeout, BW gain per ha was 8% greater in NT pastures. Furthermore, an in vitro study showed that daily production of CH4 and CH4 per gram of NDF fed were 84 and 80% lower, respectively, in turnip (Brassica rapa L.) and rapeseed (B. napus L.) diets compared with annual ryegrass. Warm-season annuals are frequently used during the summer forage slump when perennial pasture growth and quality are reduced. Research has shown that brown mid-rib sorghum × sudangrass (BMR SSG; Sorghum bicolor L. × S. arundinaceous Desv.) and pearl millet (PM; Pennisteum glaucum L.R. Br.) with crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.) tended to have greater ADG (0.98 kg/d) than sorghum × sudangrass or peal millet alone (0.85 kg/d). However, non-BMR and BMR SSG tended to have greater gains per hectare than PM or PM + crabgrass (246, 226, 181, and 188 kg/ha, respectively). Feeding of brown mid-rib sorghum × sudangrass reduced daily production of CH4 and CH4 per gram of NDF fed by 66 and 50%, respectively, compared with a perennial cool-season forage in continuous culture. Annuals not only provide increased animal gains, but also increase soil cover and decrease enteric CH4 emissions. Establishment method, grazing management, and weather conditions all play important roles in the productivity and environmental impact of these systems. A more complete life cycle analysis is needed to better characterize how management and climatic conditions impact the long-term economic and environmental sustainability of grazing annuals.