Skip to main content
ARS Home » Northeast Area » Kearneysville, West Virginia » Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory » Innovative Fruit Production, Improvement, and Protection » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #349541

Title: TILLER ANGLE CONTROL 1 modulates plant architecture in response to photosynthetic signals

Author
item Waite, Jessica
item Dardick, Christopher - Chris

Submitted to: Journal of Experimental Botany
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 7/2/2018
Publication Date: 8/7/2018
Citation: Waite, J.M., Dardick, C.D. 2018. TILLER ANGLE CONTROL 1 modulates plant architecture in response to photosynthetic signals. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jxb/ery253/5067758.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery253/5067758

Interpretive Summary: Light is an important signal from the environment that helps determine the shape in which plants grow. Both the color of the light and the amount of photosynthesis that occurs can affect the angle of plant branches. For example, growing plants in the dark will lead to branches growing upward instead of out. We found that a gene called TILLER ANGLE CONTROL 1 (TAC1) is controlled by light and is also important for the angle of plant branches. Our experiments suggest that this gene is controlled by photosynthesis and disappears when plants are grown in the dark. This gene may partially explain why plant branches grow upward in the dark and may help us understand why shade-growth and certain pruning practices work the way they do.

Technical Abstract: Light serves as an important environmental cue in regulating plant architecture. Previous work had demonstrated that both photoreceptor-mediated signaling and photosynthesis play a role in determining the orientation of plant organs. TILLER ANGLE CONTROL 1 (TAC1) was recently shown to function in setting the orientation of lateral branches in diverse plant species, but the degree to which it plays a role in light-mediated phenotypes is unknown. Here, we demonstrated that TAC1 expression was light dependent, as expression was lost under continuous dark or far-red growth conditions, but did not drop to these low levels during a diurnal time course. Loss of TAC1 in the dark was gradual, and experiments with photoreceptor mutants indicated this was not dependent upon red/far-red or blue light signaling, but partially required the signaling integrator CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 1 (COP1). Overexpression of TAC1 partially prevented the narrowing of branch angles in the dark or under far-red light. Treatment with the carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor norflurazon or the PSII inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) led to loss of TAC1 expression similar to dark or far-red conditions, but expression increased in response to the PSI inhibitor paraquat. Treatment of adult plants with norflurazon resulted in upward growth angle of branch tips. Our results indicate that TAC1 plays an important role in modulating plant architecture in response to photosynthetic signals.