Location: Subtropical Plant Pathology Research
Title: Translating surveillance data into incidence estimatesAuthor
BOURHIS, YOANN - Rothamsted Research | |
Gottwald, Timothy | |
LOPEZ-RUIS, FANCISCO - Curtin University | |
VAN DEN BOSCH, FRANK - Rothamsted Research |
Submitted to: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 2/8/2019 Publication Date: 5/20/2019 Citation: Bourhis, Y., Gottwald, T., van den Bosch, F. 2019. Translating surveillance data into incidence estimates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 374(1776). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0262 Interpretive Summary: Monitoring a population for a disease requires the hosts to be sampled and tested for the pathogen. This results in sampling series from which to estimate the disease incidence, i.e. the proportion of hosts infected. Existing estimation methods assume that disease incidence is not changing between monitoring rounds, resulting in underestimation of the disease incidence. In this paper we develop an incidence estimation model accounting for epidemic growth with monitoring rounds sampling varying incidence. We also show how to accommodate the asymptomatic period characteristic to most diseases. For practical use, we produce an approximation of the model, which is subsequently shown accurate for relevant epidemic and sampling parameters. Both the approximation and the full model are applied to stochastic spatial simulations of epidemics. The results prove their consistency for a very wide range of situations. Technical Abstract: egulatory agencies, growers and research all often survey for plant diseases, often conducting multiple rounds of survey, sampling, and testing of the samples for the pathogen. After multiple rounds of survey, if we detect the pathogen, we have sufficient information to estimate the incidence of the pathogen, that is, the proportion of host plants infected in the area being surveyed. In this paper we show how prior statistic methods often tend to underestimate this disease incidence because they do not take into account the period of time when infections have occurred but are not visible or detectable by testing samples. The method we provide is consistent across a very wide range of diseases. This method will be of benefit for regulatory agencies and practitioners for decision making on disease control/mitigation practices. |