Incorporating Beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii

Authors: HOLLINGSWORTH, R - Retired ARS Employee; ARISTIZABAL, L - Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; SHRINER, S - Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council; MASCARIN, G - Embrapa; MORAL, R - National University Of Ireland; ARTHURS, S - Biobee Usa

Submitted to: Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/17/2020
Publication Date: N/A
Citation: N/A

Interpretive Summary: Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) is the most serious insect pest of coffee. Since its inadvertent introduction to Hawaii in 2010 it has caused significant damage to the coffee industry of the islands; the search for effective and safe control measures in the Hawaiian environment has been ongoing. In this paper we describe the use of the biopesticide Beauvaria bassiana, and find that applying it early in the season is important, and that applying when infestation levels reach a threshold is just as effective as a calendar-based system, while saving significant costs. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs, however additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands.

Technical Abstract: Since its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) is used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka‘u Districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or in response to CBB field-monitoring data (threshold-based). Overall, farms adopting thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4–5 versus 7–11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB-control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there was a cost saving for threshold versus calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4% versus 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes; i.e., 8.5% ± 1.0% and 10.4% ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs, however additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands.