Location: Water Quality and Ecology Research
Title: Conservation soybean production systems in the mid-southern USA: I. Transitioning from conventional to conservation tillageAuthor
BRYANT, COREY - Mississippi State University | |
KRUTZ, LARRY - Mississippi State University | |
REYNOLDS, DANIEL - Mississippi State University | |
Locke, Martin | |
GOLDEN, BOBBY - Mississippi State University | |
IRBY, TRENT - Mississippi State University | |
Steinriede, Robert | |
SPENCER, G - Mississippi State University | |
MILLS, B - Mississippi State University | |
WOOD, C - Growers Holdings, Inc |
Submitted to: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 7/9/2020 Publication Date: 7/16/2020 Publication URL: https://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/7071286 Citation: Bryant, C.J., Krutz, L.J., Reynolds, D.B., Locke, M.A., Golden, B.R., Irby, T., Steinriede Jr, R.W., Spencer, G.D., Mills, B.E., Wood, C.W. 2020. Conservation soybean production systems in the mid-southern USA: I. Transitioning from conventional to conservation tillage. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20055 Interpretive Summary: A factor reducing the adoption of conservation tillage on medium- to coarse-textured soils in the mid-southern USA is reduced yield due to the development of restrictive soil layers. Research was conducted to determine if the inclusion of subsoiling in conservation tillage systems would maintain crop yield, profitability, and water use efficiency (WUE) relative to that of conventional tillage. Inclusion of subsoiling as a component of a conservation tillage system maintained or improved soybean grain yield, net returns above specified costs, and WUE up to 68% in three of four years relative to conventional tillage or conservation tillage with no subsoiling. Our data indicate that including subsoiling as a component of conservation tillage systems would maximize soybean grain yield, net returns above specified costs, and WUE on medium- to coarse-textured soils in the mid-southern USA. Technical Abstract: The adoption of production systems that leave greater than 30% residue coverage on the soil surface, i.e., conservation tillage, is limited in the mid-southern USA due to the development of a hardpan and subsequent yield reductions. This research was conducted to determine if the inclusion of subsoiling in conservation tillage systems can maintain yield and profitability relative to that of conventional tillage. The effects of surface and subsurface tillage on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain yield, net returns above specified costs, and water use efficiency (WUE) were investigated near Stoneville, MS on a Dubbs silt loam (Fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic Typic Hapludalfs). Conservation tillage with subsoiling maintained or improved soybean grain yield, net returns above specified costs, and WUE up to 68% in three of four years (P = 0.0002). Conversely, conservation tillage alone either had no effect or decreased soybean grain yield up to 14%, decreased net returns above specified costs up to 20%, and decreased WUE up to 14% (P = 0.0002). Our data indicate that inclusion of subsoiling minimizes yield and net return declines commonly associated with conservation tillage systems and should be a component of the early soybean production system on medium- to coarse-textured soils. |