Location: National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory
Title: Chapter 16 - Rainfall erosivity: Essential historical, conceptual, and practical perspectives for continued applicationAuthor
MCGEHEE, RYAN - Purdue University | |
Flanagan, Dennis | |
Nearing, Mark | |
SRIVASTAVA, PUNEET - Auburn University |
Submitted to: Book Chapter
Publication Type: Book / Chapter Publication Acceptance Date: 4/22/2021 Publication Date: 9/7/2021 Citation: Mcgehee, R.P., Flanagan, D.C., Nearing, M.A., Srivastava, P. 2021. Chapter 16 - Rainfall erosivity: Essential historical, conceptual, and practical perspectives for continued application. Book Chapter. pp. 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822699-5.00014-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822699-5.00014-8 Interpretive Summary: Technical Abstract: Rainfall erosivity, simply defined, is a characteristic measure of the capacity of rainfall to cause soil erosion by water. A large value for erosivity does not guarantee large amounts of erosion, but if no soil conservation practices are in place, soil loss will be more likely. A small value would indicate the reverse. Erosivity is an empirically defined measure, and it has been found to be highly correlated to event-based soil loss on natural rainfall erosion plots (R2 > 0.9; Wischmeier and Smith, 1959). It is one of six components of the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) that formed the backbone of water-driven soil erosion science for more than half-a-century in the United States and around the world. Still today many soil conservation planning efforts utilize USLE-based technologies to manage soil loss in agricultural and other erosion-prone land use cases. This chapter aims to provide historical, conceptual, and practical background information that will continue to be critical for continued application of erosivity theory, especially in light of increasingly diverse precipitation data streams. A few examples are provided at the end of the chapter to demonstrate obvious and not-so-obvious issues to avoid as well as potential ways to work around these issues. Ideally, concepts addressed in this chapter can be applied in practice to improve both accuracy and reproducibility of erosivity estimations and the erosion modeling outcomes and programs that depend on them. |