Skip to main content
ARS Home » Plains Area » Brookings, South Dakota » Integrated Cropping Systems Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #385570

Research Project: Productive Cropping Systems Based on Ecological Principles of Pest Management

Location: Integrated Cropping Systems Research

Title: Soybean aphid infestation and crop yield in relation to cultivar, foliar insecticide, and insecticidal seed treatment in South Dakota

Author
item Hesler, Louis
item Beckendorf, Eric

Submitted to: Phytoparasitica
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 3/31/2021
Publication Date: 4/19/2021
Citation: Hesler, L.S., Beckendorf, E.A. 2021. Soybean aphid infestation and crop yield in relation to cultivar, foliar insecticide, and insecticidal seed treatment in South Dakota. Phytoparasitica. 49:971-981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00914-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00914-y

Interpretive Summary: The soybean aphid remains an important pest of soybean in areas of the Midwestern United States and southern Canada. Options for managing soybean aphid are currently limited to insecticides and aphid-resistant varieties. Farmers commonly use a prophylactic insecticide treatment of soybean seed and often a remedial, late-season application of foliar insecticides against soybean aphid. Environmental concerns about seed-treatment insecticides and the discovery of insecticide resistance in field populations of soybean aphid have strengthened the case for planting aphid-resistant soybean cultivars. We conducted a three-year field study in eastern South Dakota, United States, that evaluated commercially available management products for soybean aphid that included a thiamethoxam seed treatment, spray application of '-cyhalothrin, and an aphid-resistant soybean cultivar containing the Rag1 and Rag2 aphid-resistance genes. Soybean aphid infestations had sustained, economically injurious levels in 2015, but not the other two years. Each of the three management tactics independently reduced soybean aphid populations. Thiamethoxam seed treatment and the resistant cultivar suppressed cumulative aphid-days (CAD) in all three years, whereas the spray application decreased CAD in 2015 and 2017. By far, the resistant cultivar had the greatest impact on soybean aphid populations, reducing CAD 28- to 150-fold, with soybean aphids averaging less than 100 soybean aphids per plant. Thiamethoxam seed treatment reduced CAD 1.7- to 3.5 fold, and the spray application reduced it 2.0- to 5.6-fold. Soybean yield was not affected by treatments in 2015. Yield was greater for the susceptible than for the resistant cultivar in 2016, whereas in 2017, yield was greater for plots without foliar insecticide. Implications for the use of these management products against soybean aphid are discussed.

Technical Abstract: The soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) remains an important pest of soybean (Glycine max) in areas of the Midwestern United States and southern Canada. Options for managing soybean aphid are currently limited to insecticides and aphid-resistant varieties. Farmers commonly employ a prophylactic treatment of soybean seed with a neonicotinoid insecticide such as thiamethoxam and often a remedial, late-season application of foliar insecticides such as the pyrethroid, '-cyhalothrin. Environmental concerns about neonicotinoids and the substantiation of pyrethroid resistance in field populations of soybean aphid have increased the attractiveness of using aphid-resistant soybean cultivars. We conducted a three-year field study in eastern South Dakota, United States, that evaluated commercially available management products for soybean aphid that included a thiamethoxam seed treatment, spray application of '-cyhalothrin, and an aphid-resistant soybean cultivar containing a pyramid of the Rag1 and Rag2 aphid-resistance genes. Soybean aphid infestations had sustained, economically injurious levels in 2015, but not the other two years. The three management tactics independently reduced soybean aphid populations in this study. Thiamethoxam and the resistant cultivar suppressed cumulative aphid-days (CAD) in all three years, whereas the '-cyhalothrin spray decreased CAD in 2015 and 2017. By far, the resistant cultivar had the greatest impact on soybean aphid populations, reducing CAD by 28- to 150-fold year-1, with mean numbers of aphids much less than 100 soybean aphids plant-1. Thiamethoxam seed treatment reduced CAD by 1.7- to 3.5 fold year-1, and '-cyhalothrin spray reduced it from 2.0- to 5.6-fold year-1. Soybean yield was not affected by treatments in 2015. Yield was greater for the susceptible than for the resistant cultivar in 2016, and yield was greater for plots without foliar insecticide in 2017. Implications for the use of these management tactics against soybean aphid are discussed.