Skip to main content
ARS Home » Plains Area » Las Cruces, New Mexico » Range Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #386409

Research Project: Science and Technologies for the Sustainable Management of Western Rangeland Systems

Location: Range Management Research

Title: Conventional vs Heritage cattle supplement intake, weight-gains, and body condition scores on Chihuahuan desert pasture

Author
item MCINTOSH, MATTHEW - New Mexico State University
item Estell, Richard - Rick
item CIBILS, ANDRES - New Mexico State University
item COX, ANDREW - New Mexico State University
item NYAMURYEKUNG'E, SHELEMIA - New Mexico State University
item DUNI, D - New Mexico State University
item DUFF, G - New Mexico State University
item Spiegal, Sheri
item BRANDANI, CAROLINA - New Mexico State University
item UTSUMI, S - New Mexico State University
item GOUVEA, V - New Mexico State University

Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science Supplement
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 5/31/2021
Publication Date: 10/8/2021
Citation: McIntosh, M.M., Estell, R.E., Cibils, A.F., Cox, A., Nyamuryekung'E, S., Duni, D., Duff, G., Spiegal, S.A., Brandani, C., Utsumi, S., Gouvea, V. 2021. Conventional vs Heritage cattle supplement intake, weight-gains, and body condition scores on Chihuahuan desert pasture. Journal of Animal Science Supplement. 99(3):375-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.687.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.687

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Use of adapted beef cattle biotypes is gaining momentum as a novel management strategy for limiting the environmental footprint of ranching and adapting to climate change in the southwest. We compared supplement intake (SI), calf birthweights, cow weights, and body condition scores (BCS) of desert-adapted Brangus (BR; n = 15) vs. Raramuri Criollo (RC; n = 28) cows in four adjacent pastures (1098 ± 85 ha) for three months (Mar 7 – Jun 9, 2020) using ANOVA for a RCBD (significance at P < 0.05). Cows had ad libitum access to 18% crude protein lick tubs in all pastures, which were weighed weekly to determine SI. Brangus cows had greater SI than RC, both overall (BR: 0.21 ± 0.04 vs. RC: 0.08 ± 0.03 kg × cow × d-1) and on a metabolic bodyweight basis (BR: 2.31 ± 0.09 vs. RC: 0.95 ± 0.09 g × kg0.75). All cows were bred to Brangus bulls and calf birth weights were not different between biotypes (BR: 31.5 ± 1.0; RC: 29.6 ± 0.9). Brangus cows weighed more at the beginning (535.0 ± 14.8 kg) and end (582.2 ± 14.5 kg) of the study compared to RC (beginning: 345.5 ± 11.8 kg; end: 357.0 ± 12.0 kg). Percent of bodyweight change was not different between biotypes (BR: 8.51 ± 2.35; RC: 2.85 ± 1.81 %). On a 1 to 5 scale, BCS of Brangus (4.06 ± 0.09) was greater than RC (3.18 ± 0.07) at the onset of the study, but biotypes had similar BCS at the end of the trial (BR: 4.09 ± 0.09; RC: 3.89 ± 0.08). Our preliminary results indicate that lighter RC cows were capable of gaining bodyweight and improving BCS with reduced SI, both overall and on a metabolic bodyweight basis. This finding may reflect lower nutrient requirements, better relative efficiencies and lesser grazing impacts on desert rangelands by RC cattle. Future studies will seek to replicate these breed-comparison trials over multiple years, research sites, and supply chains, with an emphasis on overall systems production efficiency and sustainability.