Location: Soil Dynamics Research
Title: Phosphorus loss in runoff from soils with different soil test phosphorus ratingsAuthor
BHATTA, A - Auburn University | |
PRASAD, R - Auburn University | |
Watts, Dexter | |
CHAKRABORTY, D - Auburn University | |
Torbert, Henry - Allen |
Submitted to: Alabama Water Resources Conference
Publication Type: Abstract Only Publication Acceptance Date: 11/10/2021 Publication Date: 11/10/2021 Citation: Bhatta, A., Prasad, R., Watts, D.B., Chakraborty, D., Torbert III, H.A. 2021. Phosphorus loss in runoff from soils with different soil test phosphorus ratings[abstract]. Alabama Water Resources Conference. Interpretive Summary: Gypsum has been used as an amendment to soilless substrates as a calcium source for plant growth and development, but the stability of supplemental flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum has not been evaluated. A study using two soilless substrate blends commonly used in greenhouse crop production and varying rates of FGD gypsum was initiated. Dolomitic lime and a control were also included. Treatments were put into clear PVC substrate columns and leachate was collected for each treatment following normal watering for a period of sixteen days. Results show that FGD gypsum is rapidly leached from the substrate column and does not appear to be to be suitable for long-term supply of calcium and sulfur to the plants. Technical Abstract: Gypsum has been used as an amendment to soilless substrates in many studies as a calcium source for plant growth and development. This study evaluated the stability of supplemental flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum in two soilless substrate blends commonly used in greenhouse crop production: a pinebark and sand mixture and Fafard 3B. Treatments of FGD gypsum at 3.26, 6.52, 9.78, 13.0 kg • m-3, and a treatment of 3.0 kg • m-3 dolomitic lime as well as a control of 0.0 kg • m-3 were incorporated into the two soilless substrates and put into clear PVC substrate columns. Then the columns were filled with tap water to container capacity and leachate was collected for each treatment. Calcium levels were determined from leachates from each treatment using a LAQUAtwin Ca2+ handheld calcium meter. Leachate samples were gathered for a period of sixteen days. Results show that FGD gypsum is rapidly leached from the substrate column. Therefore, FGD gypsum does not appear to be to be suitable for long-term supply of calcium and sulfur and, is not likely to provide reduction of phosphorus or other nutrients in leachates from soilless substrates. Specifically, our data shows that FGD gypsum incorporated into a soilless substrate washes out of the container in very few irrigation events when a standard irrigation regimen target of 10% leaching fraction is used. |