Location: Water Management and Systems Research
Title: Crop water stress index computation approaches and their sensitivity to soil water dynamicsAuthor
KATIMBO, ABIA - University Of Nebraska | |
RUDNICK, DARAN - University Of Nebraska | |
DeJonge, Kendall | |
LO, TSZ - Mississippi State University | |
QIAO, XIN - University Of Nebraska | |
FRANZ, TRENTON - University Of Nebraska | |
NAKABUYE, HOPE - University Of Nebraska | |
DUAN, JIAMING - University Of Nebraska |
Submitted to: Agricultural Water Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 2/25/2022 Publication Date: 5/31/2022 Citation: Katimbo, A., Rudnick, D.R., DeJonge, K.C., Lo, T.H., Qiao, X., Franz, T., Nakabuye, H.N., Duan, J. 2022. Crop water stress index computation approaches and their sensitivity to soil water dynamics. Agricultural Water Management. 266. Article e107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107575 Interpretive Summary: There is a growing interest of using canopy temperature (Tc) based methods, including crop water stress index (CWSI), for irrigation management. However, different approaches exist to normalize Tc to microclimatic conditions, which can influence the accuracy and suitability of CWSI for irrigation scheduling. This study evaluated the performance of CWSI computation approaches and their sensitivity to changes in soil water depletion under different water stress levels as well as the uncertainties of each approach under varying weather conditions. Results suggest that careful selection of appropriate computational approaches and irrigation triggering thresholds for CWSI is desired. Technical Abstract: There is a growing interest of using canopy temperature (Tc) based methods, including crop water stress index (CWSI), for irrigation management. However, different approaches exist to normalize Tc to microclimatic conditions, which can influence the accuracy and suitability of CWSI for irrigation scheduling. This study evaluated the performance of CWSI computation approaches and their sensitivity to changes in soil water depletion under different water stress levels as well as the uncertainties of each approach under varying weather conditions. There were six different approaches – two empirical methods using developed lower baseline (i.e., CWSI-EB1, CWSI-EB2), two empirical methods using either artificial (CWSI-EA) or actual/natural (CWSI-EN) canopy reference surfaces, and two theoretical approaches which differ by how aerodynamic and canopy resistances are determined (CWSI-Th1, CWSI-Th2). Stationary infrared thermometers (IRTs) provided Tc to calculate CWSI-EB, CWSI-Th, and CWSI-EN; whereas mobile IRTs and a thermal camera provided Tc and temperatures of artificial canopy reference surfaces to calculate CWSI-EA. These measurements were collected from full and deficit irrigated and rainfed maize plots in West Central Nebraska. Day-to-day variations within and across CWSI approaches were evident and their sensitivity to soil water depletion varied. High sensitivity to depletion (Dr,i) was observed for CWSI-Th and CWSI-EB under severe stress (i.e., Dr,i between 65 and 75%) with r2 ranging from 0.61 to 0.80 and 0.69 to 0.79, respectively. Additionally, it was observed that CWSI sensitivity was influenced more by the clearness of the sky (i.e., Rs/Rso) than other weather variables. Observed variability and instability of CWSI under fluctuating weather conditions suggest that careful selection of appropriate computation approach and triggering threshold is desired. |