Evaluation of alternative-design cotton gin lint cleaning machines on fiber length uniformity index

Authors: Armijo, Carlos; Delhom, Christopher; Whitelock, Derek; Tumuluru, Jaya Shankar; Yeater, Kathleen; ROWE, CHANDLER - University Of Georgia; Wanjura, John; SUI, RUIXIU - Retired ARS Employee; Holt, Gregory; MARTIN, VIKKI - Cotton, Inc; KOTHARI, NEHA - Cotton, Inc

Submitted to: AgriEngineering
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 11/2/2023
Publication Date: 11/8/2023
Citation: Armijo, C.B., Delhom, C.D., Whitelock, D.P., Tumuluru, J., Yeater, K.M., Rowe, C., Wanjura, J.D., Sui, R., Holt, G.A., Martin, V.B., Kothari, N. 2023. Evaluation of alternative-design cotton gin lint cleaning machines on fiber length uniformity index. AgriEngineering. 5(4):2123-2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040130.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5040130

Interpretive Summary: Developing cotton ginning methods that improve fiber length uniformity index to levels that are compatible with the newer and more efficient spinning technologies would expand market share and increase the demand for cotton products and give U.S. cotton a competitive edge to synthetic fibers. Older studies on lint cleaning machines showed that the most widely used feed mechanism that places fiber on the cleaning cylinder damages fiber and reduces uniformity. The present study evaluates how conventional and experimental feed mechanisms affect uniformity. The lint cleaners were used with both saw and roller gin stands. Four diverse cotton cultivars were used in the test. Results show that the saw gin stand with the direct-feed lint cleaner had the best uniformity at 85.8%. Prior research has shown that roller ginning is consistently higher in uniformity than any type of saw ginning. In this study, the roller ginning treatments averaged 85.5%, so it is encouraging that the saw gin stand with the direct-feed lint cleaner had very high uniformity. This suggests that it may be beneficial to use a feed mechanism that places fiber directly onto the lint cleaning saw without changing direction. Additionally, the saw gin coupled lint cleaner (which eliminates the feed mechanism) had a uniformity of 84.3% which is also a respectable level of uniformity. These results indicate that the direct-feed lint cleaner and coupled lint cleaner warrant further testing under better controlled conditions.

Technical Abstract: Developing cotton ginning methods that improve fiber length uniformity index to levels that are compatible with the newer and more efficient spinning technologies would expand market share and increase the demand for cotton products and give U.S. cotton a competitive edge to synthetic fibers. Older studies on lint cleaning machines showed that the most widely used feed mechanism that places fiber on the cleaning cylinder damages fiber and reduces uniformity. The present study evaluates how conventional and experimental feed mechanisms affect uniformity. The lint cleaners were used with both saw and roller gin stands. Four diverse cotton cultivars from the Far West, Southwest, and Mid-South were used in the test. Statistical analysis used a Random Effects Modeling approach which included constructing a 95% confidence interval for each ginning treatment around the predicted mean for the fiber property of interest, and then examining which treatments overlap (for comparison). Results show that the micro saw gin with the direct-feed lint cleaner had the best uniformity at 85.8%. Prior research has shown that roller ginning is consistently higher in uniformity than any type of saw ginning. In this study, the roller ginning treatments had uniformities of 85.3 and 85.6%, so it is encouraging that the saw gin stand with the direct-feed lint cleaner had very high uniformity. This suggests that it may be beneficial to place fiber directly onto the lint cleaning saw without changing direction. Additionally, the saw gin coupled lint cleaner had a uniformity of 84.3% which is also a respectable level of uniformity. These results indicate that the direct-feed lint cleaner and coupled lint cleaner warrant further testing under better controlled conditions.