Skip to main content
ARS Home » Southeast Area » Stoneville, Mississippi » Southern Insect Management Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #415079
Research Project: Ecologically Sustainable Approaches to Insect Resistance Management in Bt Cotton

Location: Southern Insect Management Research

Title: Profitability of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L.), when controlling bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), with variable treatment thresholds

Author
item CALVIN, WILFRID - Texas A&M University
item YANG, FEI - Texas A&M University
item GORE, JEFFREY - Mississippi State University
item GREENE, JEREMY - Clemson University
item KERNS, DAVID - Texas A&M University

Submitted to: Crop Protection
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 8/1/2023
Publication Date: 8/6/2023
Citation: Calvin, W., Yang, F., Gore, J., Greene, J.K., Kerns, D.L. 2023. Profitability of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L.), when controlling bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), with variable treatment thresholds. Crop Protection. 173: 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106368.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106368

Interpretive Summary: Action thresholds to determine when to spray non-Bt, Bollgard II, and Bollgard 3 cotton was evaluated in multiple field trials across three states. In general, insecticide sprays based on egg thresholds and damage thresholds both provided good control of bollworm in non-Bt and Bollgard II cottons. Insecticide sprays did not improve yields of Bollgard 3 cotton. The results of this study will be used to refine treatment thresholds for bollworm in cotton across the southern U.S.

Technical Abstract: Crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis proteins have offered valuable crop protection benefits including reduced foliar insecticide use and crop yield protection. Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has developed resistance to one or more Bt proteins, which consequently threatens these benefits. This has resulted in a renewed emphasis on the implementation of action thresholds for H. zea management decisions in cotton. Field experiments were conducted in College Station, TX; Stoneville, MS; and Blackville, SC, during 2020–2021 to evaluate current H. zea threshold recommendations for Texas, Mississippi, and South Carolina. Three Bt cotton technologies and five thresholds were evaluated. The Bt cotton technologies evaluated included non-Bt (NBT), Bollgard® 2 (BG2; Cry1Ac + Cry2Ab), and Bollgard® 3 (BG3; Cry1Ac + Cry2Ab + Vip3Aa). Across years and locations, within NBT cotton, all thresholds, including 20% oviposition, 6% fruiting forms injury, =3% large larvae, and preventive sprays, resulted in greater control of H. zea and higher yield and profitability relative to non-treated NBT cotton. The threshold using 6% injury to squares and bolls was the most effective in terms of yield relative to the preventive spray. Across years and locations, the BG2 cotton sprayed based on 20% oviposition or preventively resulted in greater control of H. zea, and all treatments resulted in a yield or profitability equivalent to that of the non-treated BG2 cotton. For BG3 cotton, spraying based on any of the thresholds was not beneficial. For NBT and BG2 cotton, thresholds of 20% oviposition, 6% injury to fruiting forms, or =3% large larvae provided a reduction in insecticide applications relative to the preventive spray treatment, suggesting that these thresholds were effective triggers for controlling H. zea.