Skip to main content
ARS Home » Plains Area » Las Cruces, New Mexico » Cotton Ginning Research » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #417567

Research Project: Improving the Production and Processing of Western and Long-Staple Cotton and Companion Crops to Enhance Quality, Value, and Sustainability

Location: Cotton Ginning Research

Title: Pneumatic fractionator impact on Pima lint properties in comparison to conventional lint cleaner used by the industry

Author
item Tumuluru, Jaya Shankar
item Whitelock, Derek
item Armijo, Carlos
item Delhom, Christopher
item FUNK, PAUL - Retired ARS Employee
item KOTHARI, NEHA - Cotton, Inc

Submitted to: ASABE Annual International Meeting
Publication Type: Other
Publication Acceptance Date: 7/29/2024
Publication Date: 7/29/2024
Citation: Tumuluru, J., Whitelock, D.P., Armijo, C.B., Delhom, C.D., Funk, P.A., Kothari, N. 2024. Pneumatic fractionator impact on Pima lint properties in comparison to conventional lint cleaner used by the industry. 2024 ASABE Annual International Meeting, , July 28-31,2024, Anaheim, California. Presentation only.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two lint cleaners for processing saw-ginned Pima cotton. One was a conventional lint cleaner, while the other was an experimental pneumatic lint cleaner. The study assessed the impact of both cleaners on foreign matter removal and the quality of lint produced. The pneumatic cleaner was tested under different conditions, including varying levels of lint moisture content (5-16%, w.b.), line pressure (40-80 psi), and residence time (15-45 sec). The conventional lint cleaner was operated per the manufacturer's specifications with a lint moisture content of 5% w.b. The quality of lint produced by both cleaners was assessed using the HVI method. The results showed that the pneumatic cleaner's lint quality was mainly affected by the lint moisture content, followed by residence time and pressure. On the other hand, foreign matter removal was more influenced by line pressure and lint moisture. Compared to the conventional lint cleaner, some conditions tested using the pneumatic cleaner yielded better-quality lint in terms of upper half mean length, uniformity index, micronaire, strength, and trash content.