Fruit development in blackberry types and cultivars – Impact of days and temperature from bloom to stages of ripening

Authors: VANCE, AMANDA - Oregon State University; JONES, PATRICK - Oregon State University; Finn, Chad; STRIK, BERNADINE - Oregon State University

Submitted to: Journal of the American Pomological Society
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 5/14/2019
Publication Date: 10/17/2019
Citation: Vance, A., Jones, P., Finn, C.E., Strik, B. 2019. Fruit development in blackberry types and cultivars – Impact of days and temperature from bloom to stages of ripening. Journal of American Pomological Society. 73(4):227-239.

Interpretive Summary: Trying to predict the phenological characteristics (e.g., bloom date, ripening date) can be extremely valuable to berry growers as it helps with planning management practices and marketing programs. Using the number of growing degree days (GDD) to determine these event has been common in some crops but this has not been well documented in blackberry. Twelve trailing (‘Black Diamond’, ‘Black Pearl’, ‘Boysen’, ‘Everthornless’, ‘Kotata’, ‘Logan’, ‘Marion’, ‘Metolius’, ‘Nightfall’, ‘Obsidian’, ‘Silvan’, ‘Siskiyou’), two erect (‘Navaho’, ‘Ouachita’), and two semierect (‘Chester Thornless’, ‘Triple Crown’) cultivars were studied. Flower development was measured twice per week over two years. Using this data, several modified models based upon temperature were compared to a “standard model.” Results demonstrated that the interactions of year, cultivar, and flowering season affected flower development. Using the standard or modified GDD models, we were not able to consistently predict bloom date or time from bloom to fruit ripening stages.

Technical Abstract: The number of growing degree days (GDD) may be correlated with fruiting season but this has not been well documented in blackberry (Rubus L. subgenus Rubus, Watson). Twelve trailing (‘Black Diamond’, ‘Black Pearl’, ‘Boysen’, ‘Everthornless’, ‘Kotata’, ‘Logan’, ‘Marion’, ‘Metolius’, ‘Nightfall’, ‘Obsidian’, ‘Silvan’, ‘Siskiyou’), two erect (‘Navaho’, ‘Ouachita’), and two semierect (‘Chester Thornless’, ‘Triple Crown’) cultivars were studied. Year 1 was warmer than year 2, with higher overall GDD starting in June. At early-, mid-, and late-bloom, 10 flowers of each cultivar were selected randomly from an inflorescence, tagged and the stage of development recorded twice per week (bloom, first red, fully red, first black, glossy black, and dull black). The number of days and GDD (using daily minimum and maximum temperatures, base 10 °C, max. 30 °C, “standard model”, from an on-site weather station) from bloom to ripening stage and GDD from 1 Jan. to bloom were recorded. Year, cultivar, flowering season, and their interactions were significant for GDD from 1 Jan. to bloom for all blackberry types, indicating the standard model could not predict bloom date. The GDD formula was modified to base 5 °C and max. 25 °C (trailing) or 35 °C (erect and semierect) with little to no improvement in prediction of bloom to any stage of development. Year, cultivar, and flowering season (with interactions) also affected days from open flower to developmental stage [e.g. from bloom to glossy black: 42–62 days (trailing), 55–65 days (erect), and 58–67 days (semierect); and averaging 3–5 additional days to reach dull black]. Using the standard or modified GDD models, we were not able to consistently predict bloom date or time from bloom to fruit ripening stages.