Location: Forage and Range Research
Title: Breeding for resilience to water deficit and its predicted effect on forage mass in tall fescueAuthor
Waldron, Blair | |
Jensen, Kevin | |
Peel, Michael | |
PICASSO, VALENTIN - University Of Wisconsin |
Submitted to: Agronomy
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Publication Acceptance Date: 11/16/2021 Publication Date: 10/20/2021 Citation: Waldron, B.L., Jensen, K.B., Peel, M., Picasso, V.D. 2021. Breeding for resilience to water deficit and its predicted effect on forage mass in tall fescue. Agronomy. 11(11). Article 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112094 Interpretive Summary: Resilience is increasingly part of the discussion on climate change, yet there is a lack of breeding for resilience per se. This experiment examined the genetic parameters of a novel, direct measure of resilience to water deficit in tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum [Schreb.] Darbysh.). Resilience was found to be both measurable and heritable, with gains in resilience from selection predicted. Breeding for improved resilience was predicted to have little effect on forage mass at non-crisis water deficit environments. Overall, results indicated that this novel metric could facilitate breeding new grass varieties and developing grazinglands that are resilient to a drier future. Technical Abstract: Resilience is increasingly part of the discussion on climate change, yet there is a lack of breeding for resilience per se. This experiment examined the genetic parameters of a novel, direct measure of resilience to water deficit in tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum [Schreb.] Darbysh.). Heritability, genetic correlations, and predicted gain from selection were estimated for average productivity, resilience, and stability based on forage mass of a tall fescue half-sib population grown under a line-source irrigation system with five different water levels (WL). Resilience was both measurable and moderately heritable (h2=0.43), with gains of 2.4% per cycle of selection predicted. Furthermore, resilience was not correlated with average response over environments and negatively correlated with stability, indicating that it was not a measure of responsiveness to more favorable environments. Genetic correlations among WL ranged from 0.87 to 0.56, however in contrast, resilience was either not or slightly negatively genetically correlated with WL except for moderate correlations with the ‘crisis’ WL. Thus, breeding for improved resilience was predicted to have little effect on forage mass at any given individual water deficit environment. Overall, results indicated that this novel metric could facilitate breeding for improved resilience per se to water deficit environments. |