Case study analysis of innovative producers toward sustainable integrated crop-livestock systems: trajectory, achievements,and thought process

Authors: MOOJEN, FERNANDA GOMES - University Of Idaho; RYSCHAWY, JULIE - University Of Toulouse; WULFHORST, J.D. - University Of Idaho; Archer, David; CARVALHO, PAULO CESAR DE - Federal University Of Rio Grande Do Sul; Hendrickson, John

Submitted to: Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: 2/23/2024
Publication Date: 4/23/2024
Citation: Moojen, F., Ryschawy, J., Wulfhorst, J., Archer, D.W., Carvalho, P.F., Hendrickson, J.R. 2024. Case study analysis of innovative producers toward sustainable integrated crop-livestock systems: trajectory, achievements,and thought process. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 44. Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00953-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00953-9

Interpretive Summary: Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems (ICLS) are systems where crops and livestock are produced on the same land. These systems could provide multiple economic, social, and environmental benefits. These systems can be more complex for producers to manage, but some producers have successfully managed these systems. Research was conducted to highlight how these producers perceive ICLS and if there were turning points that led them to adopt these systems. A total of 15 producers in three countries, Brazil, United States, and France, were interviewed. The interviews showed that there were important turning points for all of the producers that led to shifts in production practices. Results also showed that integrating crop and livestock positively impacted family producers’ businesses and lives. Results from this research will be helpful to producers, conservationists, agricultural advisors, and policymakers in helping understand barriers to adopting ICLS and approaches such as promoting knowledge exchange that are likely to be helpful in reducing these barriers.

Technical Abstract: Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) are more complex to properly manage than specialized farming systems due to multiple interactions between crops, livestock, and grassland. Despite individual and structural barriers to adopting sustainable ICLS, some innovative producers have successfully conducted integrated production practices. In this context, a research gap exists in understanding the motivations and incentives for transitioning to such systems. This study aims to address ICLS adoption barriers by analyzing the trajectory, achievements, and thought processes of 15 producers practicing ICLS. Our objectives were to (1) highlight producers’ perceptions of ICLS levers and barriers and (2) identify turning point factors that enabled producers to overcome the barriers. We used a unique set of cases in three continental regions (southern Brazil, the northern Great Plains region in the United States, and southern France) and conducted semi-structured interviews. Interviewees emphasized that ICLS imply dealing with barriers ranging from mindset change to operational adaptations, but they also emphasized the rewarding nature of ICLS when properly managed. All their trajectories had important turning points, such as programs or initiatives, human influence, and broader social and economic reasons that resulted in shifts in their production practices and thought processes. The cases also highlighted that integrating crops and livestock positively impacted family producers’ business outcomes, soil health, and livelihood options. Still, individual barriers, including operational management, and structural barriers, including stakeholder awareness and commitment, must be overcome. Encouraging initiatives that offer a systemic approach and promote knowledge exchange can address part of ICLS adoption barriers. Initiatives must embrace a broader innovation ecosystem, having extension teams in close contact with researchers and stakeholders to assist producers in providing support for a more sophisticated level of management that ICLS require. Overall, we found commonalities in consciousness and proactiveness in remarkable cases that could inspire broader sustainability transitions.