Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #412486

Research Project: Interplay of the Physical Environment, Social Domain, and Intrapersonal Factors on Nutrition and Physical Activity Related Health Behaviors in Children and Adolescents

Location: Location not imported yet.

Title: Differences in Socioeconomic and Nutrition Environment Explanatory Variables for Food and Nutrition Security Among US Households with and without Children

Author
item Thomson, Jessica
item LANDRY, ALICIA - University Of Central Arkansas
item Walls, Tameka

Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 3/11/2024
Publication Date: N/A
Citation: N/A

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Objectives: The objectives were to identify and compare socioeconomic and nutrition environment explanatory variables for food and nutrition security in households with and without children. Methods: Secondary analysis was performed on an existing dataset collected in 2021 and consisting of households at risk for or experiencing food insecurity. Logistic regression was used to identify significant explanatory variables for food and nutrition security by presence or absence of children (=18 years of age) in the households. Explanatory variables included age; gender; income; fruit and vegetable intake; scratch-cooked, fast food, and processed meals; utilization barriers to healthful meals; limited availability of foods; dietary and healthfulness choice; and shopping at dollar stores and convenience stores. Results: 73% and 63%, respectively, of households with and without children had food insecurity. 38% and 30%, respectively, of households with and without children had nutrition insecurity. For both household types, greater dietary choice increased odds (4-15 times) of food and nutrition security. Male gender, more fast-food meals, greater healthfulness choice, and shopping at convenience stores increased odds (2-14 times) of food security, while more processed meals and greater utilization barriers to healthful meals decreased odds (30%-40%) of food security for households with children. Greater utilization barriers also decreased odds (20%) of food security in households without children. Higher income and greater healthfulness choice increased odds (20% and 3 times) of nutrition security in households with children, while no/low (vs moderate/high) limited availability of foods increased odds (2 times) of nutrition security in households without children. Conclusions: Dietary choice appears to be a universally important factor affecting food and nutrition security in households at risk for or experiencing food insecurity. Differential associations between food and nutrition security and other household characteristics (e.g., healthfulness choice for households with children) suggests that the presence of children may need to be considered when designing interventions or proposing policy to reduce food and nutrition insecurity.